Member

Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS

Renew · Lithuania

Group: Renew
Country: Lithuania
Roll-call participation: 99.2 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.2 %ⓘ of 5 878 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 95.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: LS Liberalų sąjūdis
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 105 of 5 719 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, INTA (substitute), SEDE
Member id: 124766

National party: LS Liberalų sąjūdis
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 105 of 5 719 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, INTA (substitute), SEDE
Member id: 124766

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.2 %

5 883 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 90.4 % (+8.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.2 %

5 715 of 5 878 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 95.5 % (+1.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.8 %

105 of 5 719 votes where their group had a clear line

79 opposite (for ↔ against), 25 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.9 %

53 of 5 883 votes cast

Participation 99.2 % — Renew median 90.4 %, 76 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS	99.2 %
Renew median	90.4 %
Lowest in the group	65.3 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	76

With majority line 97.2 % — Renew median 95.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS	97.2 %
Renew median	95.5 %
Lowest in the group	77.5 %
Highest in the group	98.3 %
Members	76

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	23
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	91
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	129
24 Oct 2024	13	0
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	31
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	227
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	247
3 Apr 2025	62	61
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	219
8 May 2025	103	102
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	40
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	86
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	184
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	266
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	66
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	140
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	196
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	2
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	225
29 Apr 2026	296	294
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	95
21 May 2026	98	97
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	126
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	70
8 Jul 2026	144	144
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	154
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	98 % of 5 485 shared	92 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	96 % of 5 248 shared	92 %
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Renew	Bulgaria	96 % of 5 463 shared	92 %
Select Michał KOBOSKO	Michał KOBOSKO	Renew	Poland	96 % of 5 393 shared	92 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	96 % of 5 169 shared	92 %
Select Valérie HAYER	Valérie HAYER	Renew	France	96 % of 5 612 shared	92 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	96 % of 5 518 shared	92 %
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Renew	Luxembourg	96 % of 5 491 shared	92 %
Select Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Renew	Romania	96 % of 4 918 shared	92 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	96 % of 5 802 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	90 % of 3 562 shared	86 %
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	89 % of 4 633 shared	86 %
Select Sven MIKSER	Sven MIKSER	S&D	Estonia	89 % of 5 772 shared	86 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	89 % of 5 417 shared	86 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	89 % of 5 221 shared	86 %
Select Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	S&D	Lithuania	89 % of 5 548 shared	86 %
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	S&D	Portugal	89 % of 4 765 shared	86 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	89 % of 5 424 shared	86 %
Select Sérgio GONÇALVES	Sérgio GONÇALVES	S&D	Portugal	88 % of 5 714 shared	86 %
Select Tobias CREMER	Tobias CREMER	S&D	Germany	88 % of 5 410 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-UA Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	23 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group	Member	11 Mar 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working group	Vice-chair	8 Jan 2025	now
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025
Delegation for relations with AfghanistanD-AF Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	3 Oct 2024

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFET	19 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	DROI	15 Sept 2026
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures applicable to Armenian products	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	2 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	SEDE	12 May 2026
Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	16 Mar 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence Union	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	16 Mar 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153	Opinion rapporteur	SEDE	26 Feb 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	23 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	INTA	29 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFET	28 Jan 2026

Show all 20 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

72 contributions recorded; 23 on behalf of their group; 104 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (A10-0172/2026 - Michael Gahler) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Protecting EU citizens’ data from hybrid threats: the Lithuanian case (topical debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban's adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 148

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	Exclusion of purchases of Russian sable pelts from EU sanctions E-10-2026-003651	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0403	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0414	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0416	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0399	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0361	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0348	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0353	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0320	Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors	—

Show all 148 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 114

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
16 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections AFET-AM-791057	AFET	11
10 Jul 2026	Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners AFET-AM-790940	AFET	7
2 Jul 2026	From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up SEDE-AM-789957	SEDE	24
24 Jun 2026	Establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790119	LIBE	4
15 Jun 2026	A new co-ownership for the future of Euro-Mediterranean relations – the Pact for the Mediterranean AFET-AM-789979	AFET	4
15 Jun 2026	EU-Syria political relations AFET-AM-789951	AFET	74
11 Jun 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure SEDE-AM-789927	SEDE	20
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789067	CJ19	4
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070	CJ19	21
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789068	CJ19	5

Show all 114 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Lithuania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124766?scope=all&seats=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS”. Member record. memberId 124766. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124766?scope=all&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124766. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124766?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124766,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124766?scope=all&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124766?scope=all&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124766. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124766. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 148

Amendments tabled in committee, 114

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928