Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member

Csaba MOLNÁR

S&D · Hungary

Group
S&D
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
76.5 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
95.2 %ⓘ of 4 530 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %
More facts (5)
National party
DK Demokratikus Koalíció
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
191 of 4 458 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, ITRE (substitute)
Member id
124722
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.5 %

4 532 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (−13.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.2 %

4 311 of 4 530 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (−1.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.3 %

191 of 4 458 votes where their group had a clear line

158 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line, 18 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.1 %

51 of 4 532 votes cast

Participation 76.5 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Csaba MOLNÁR76.5 %
S&D median89.9 %
Lowest in the group30.4 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members138
With majority line 95.2 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Csaba MOLNÁR95.2 %
S&D median96.3 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members138
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 32 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242321
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249287
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129123
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202421
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245737
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243332
19 Dec 2024450
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 2025450
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 2025320
12 Feb 2025100
13 Feb 2025300
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228225
13 Mar 2025240
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251246
3 Apr 20256260
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220130
8 May 20251030
21 May 202522
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255553
9 Jul 2025134134
10 Jul 2025360
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 202510199
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 2025690
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255544
9 Oct 2025650
20 Oct 202530
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 20251860
23 Oct 2025550
13 Nov 2025267265
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510099
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254342
18 Dec 20254231
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112109
22 Jan 20265834
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 20261410
24 Feb 2026430
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197193
11 Mar 20266060
12 Mar 2026340
25 Mar 202630
26 Mar 2026690
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225223
29 Apr 2026296293
30 Apr 20266858
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269692
21 May 20269883
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 20264039
17 Jun 2026127123
18 Jun 20267754
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267271
8 Jul 2026144113
9 Jul 2026670
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155152
16 Sept 20268079
17 Sept 2026124121

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Klára DOBREV S&DHungary99 % of 3 938 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany95 % of 3 836 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany95 % of 3 544 shared93 %
Marc ANGEL S&DLuxembourg95 % of 4 470 shared93 %
Bruno TOBBACK S&DBelgium95 % of 4 464 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain95 % of 4 306 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain95 % of 3 864 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain95 % of 3 043 shared93 %
René REPASI S&DGermany95 % of 4 291 shared93 %
Kathleen VAN BREMPT S&DBelgium95 % of 4 319 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany88 % of 4 413 shared50 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium88 % of 3 522 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance88 % of 4 218 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia88 % of 3 930 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia88 % of 4 257 shared86 %
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ RenewSlovakia88 % of 3 566 shared86 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia88 % of 4 511 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 4 476 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 4 517 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia88 % of 4 287 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeVice-chair3 Feb 2025now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationMember16 Jul 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working groupMember30 Jan 2025now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember23 Jan 20252 Feb 2025

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European UnionShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Court of AuditorsShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European External Action ServiceShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Economic and Social CommitteeShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Committee of the RegionsShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European OmbudsmanShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Data Protection SupervisorShadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’)Shadow rapporteurCONT17 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsShadow rapporteurCONT15 Sept 2026
Evaluating the successes achieved and lessons learned from EU enlargements since 2004 in the implementation of the EU budgetShadow rapporteurCONT12 May 2026
Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818Opinion rapporteurCONT22 Jan 2026
Union Civil Protection Mechanism and Union support for health emergency preparedness and response, and repealing Decision No 1313/2013/EU (Union Civil Protection Mechanism)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT20 Jan 2026
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsRapporteurCONT25 Sept 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilShadow rapporteurCONT18 Jul 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Court of AuditorsShadow rapporteurCONT18 Jul 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Economic and Social CommitteeShadow rapporteurCONT18 Jul 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Committee of the RegionsShadow rapporteurCONT18 Jul 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’)Shadow rapporteurCONT18 Jul 2025
Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors - RO nomineeShadow rapporteurCONT11 Mar 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairEUDS28 Jan 2025
2024/2106(INI) Opinion to REGI on possibilities for simplification of cohesion fundShadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT28 Nov 2024
2024/0804(NLE) Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors - BG nomineeRapporteurCONT16 Oct 2024
2024/2021(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2022(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European UnionShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2023(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of AuditorsShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2024(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action ServiceShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2025(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Economic and Social CommitteeShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2026(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Committee of the RegionsShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2027(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European OmbudsmanShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2028(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Data Protection SupervisorShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
2024/2029(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’)Shadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
Second Council discharge for 2022Shadow rapporteurCONT26 Jul 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

20 contributions recorded, 8 written statements; 3 on behalf of their group; 21 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Discharge 2024 (joint debate) Speech · 2 minRead
28 Apr 2026Discharge 2024 (joint debate) Speech · 3 minRead
10 Mar 2026Presentation of the Energy Package (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Nov 2025Communication on the European Democracy Shield (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate) StatementRead
21 May 2025The Hungarian government's drift to Russia-style repression: legislative threats to freedom of expression and democratic participation (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 2 minRead
6 May 2025Discharge 2023 (joint debate) StatementRead
2 Apr 2025Recent legislative changes in Hungary and their impact on fundamental rights (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 2 minRead
11 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence (debate) StatementRead

Show all 20 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 6

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026
4 Jul 2025The abuse of state advertising for political influence and enforcement of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) E-10-2025-002736Written questionwith 23 co-authors28 Aug 2025
23 Apr 2025Acquisition of X by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI E-10-2025-001615Written questionwith 42 co-authors14 Jul 2025
19 Mar 2025Seizing the Russian shadow fleet in the Baltic Sea: the Commission’s measures to prevent vessel sales E-10-2025-001174Written questionwith 60 co-authors29 Jul 2025
17 Jan 2025Actual or foreseeable negative effects of Elon Musk’s statements on civic discourse, electoral processes and freedom and pluralism of the media under the DSA E-10-2025-000191Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Mar 2025

Amendments tabled in committee, 48

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
10 Sept 2026Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council CONT-AM-792137 CONT2
22 Jul 2026Evaluating the successes achieved and lessons learned from EU enlargements since 2004 in the implementation of the EU budget CONT-AM-791056 CONT33
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062 CJ6540
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057 CJ6514
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058 CJ6517
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059 CJ6512
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061 CJ6529
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE4
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE1

Show all 48 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124722?docs=all&roles=all&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Csaba MOLNÁR”. Member record. memberId 124722. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124722?docs=all&roles=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124722. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124722?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-124722,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Csaba MOLNÁR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124722?docs=all&roles=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124722?docs=all&roles=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124722. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124722. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}