Decision
Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024
- Effect
- Rejected
- Result
- 231 for · 389 against · 33 abstained roll call
- Date
- 28 April 2026, 14:14–14:25
- Kind
- Resolution
More facts (9)
- Margin
- by a clear majority
- Dossier
- 2025/2238(INI)
- Source
- Committee report by Julien Sanchez
- Topics
- EU budget & fundsJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 81 votes · 41 roll calls · 36 amendments
- Requested by
- Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · Patriots (12 split votes) · ESN (1 roll call) · Members (1 roll call)
- Sitting
- Tuesday 28 April 2026
- Final vote
- 190161
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained (roll call).
Rejected by a clear majority.
Parliament rejected the text.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 36 amendments (28 adopted, 8 rejected) and 44 parts of the text voted on separately (28 adopted, 8 rejected, 8 lapsed).
Backed by EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, Patriots and ESN.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 2 | Against 41 | Abst. 0 | No vote 3 of 46 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.93 | |
| Greens | For 0 | Against 45 | Abst. 1 | No vote 7 of 53 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.97 | |
| S&D | For 5 | Against 119 | Abst. 0 | No vote 11 of 135 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.94 | |
| Renew | For 5 | Against 61 | Abst. 5 | No vote 6 of 77 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.79 | |
| EPP | For 164 | Against 3 | Abst. 0 | No vote 18 of 185 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.97 | |
| ECR | For 47 | Against 8 | Abst. 20 | No vote 6 of 81 | Majority line For | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.44 | |
| Patriots | For 0 | Against 76 | Abst. 1 | No vote 8 of 85 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.98 | |
| ESN | For 2 | Against 19 | Abst. 3 | No vote 3 of 27 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.69 | |
| No group | For 6 | Against 17 | Abst. 3 | No vote 4 of 30 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.
Voted against their group, 27
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
The Left line Against · 2 voted for of 43 who voted
Voted for (2)
- Kathleen FUNCHION Ireland
- Lynn BOYLAN Ireland
Greens line Against · 1 abstained of 46 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Mārtiņš STAĶIS Latvia
S&D line Against · 5 voted for of 124 who voted
Voted for (5)
- Christel SCHALDEMOSE Denmark
- Maria GRAPINI Romania
- Marianne VIND Denmark
- Niels FUGLSANG Denmark
- René REPASI Germany
Renew line Against · 5 voted for, 5 abstained of 71 who voted
Voted for (5)
- Christine SINGER Germany
- Engin EROGLU Germany
- Joachim STREIT Germany
- Michael MCNAMARA Ireland
- Sandro GOZI France
Abstained (5)
- Gilles BOYER France
- Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN Germany
- Moritz KÖRNER Germany
- Nathalie LOISEAU France
- Valérie DEVAUX France
EPP line For · 3 voted against of 167 who voted
Voted against (3)
- Liesbet SOMMEN Belgium
- Pascal ARIMONT Belgium
- Wouter BEKE Belgium
Patriots line Against · 1 abstained of 77 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Afroditi LATINOPOULOU Greece
ESN line Against · 2 voted for, 3 abstained of 24 who voted
Voted for (2)
- Marcin SYPNIEWSKI Poland
- Volker SCHNURRBUSCH Germany
Abstained (3)
- Rada LAYKOVA Bulgaria
- Roberto VANNACCI Italy
- Sarah KNAFO France
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 5 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0.61 |
| Belgium | 3 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0.78 |
| Bulgaria | 7 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0.20 |
| Cyprus | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Czechia | 9 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 |
| Germany | 34 | 51 | 3 | 8 | 0.37 |
| Denmark | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.40 |
| Estonia | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Spain | 22 | 31 | 0 | 7 | 0.38 |
| Finland | 4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0.57 |
| France | 7 | 64 | 4 | 6 | 0.78 |
| Greece | 7 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0.40 |
| Croatia | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Hungary | 4 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 0.60 |
| Ireland | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 |
| Italy | 27 | 39 | 1 | 9 | 0.37 |
| Lithuania | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 |
| Luxembourg | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Latvia | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Malta | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Netherlands | 7 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 0.63 |
| Poland | 22 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 0.17 |
| Portugal | 7 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 |
| Romania | 15 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 0.28 |
| Sweden | 8 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0.37 |
| Slovenia | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Slovakia | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0.89 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonella SBERNA Italy | ECR | Speeches2 | 28 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Dick ERIXON Sweden | ECR | Speeches2 | 27 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Julien SANCHEZ France | Patriots | Speeches2 | 27 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | Against |
| Daniel FREUND Germany | Greens | Speeches1 | 27 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group | Against |
| Davor Ivo STIER Croatia | EPP | Speeches1 | 27 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | No vote recorded |
| Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ Czechia | EPP | Speeches1 | 27 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group | For |
Show the other 15 speakers
All votes on this decision, 81
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 1 – Am 15 | Roll call | 505 for, 109 against, 29 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 3 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 2 – Am 4/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘respect for the rule of law’, ‘deriving from breaches of the rule of law’, ‘against violations of the other values enshrined in Article 2 TEU’, ‘breaches of democracy, equality and fundamental rights, which can have’, ‘such’ and ‘of other Article 2 TEU values’” | Roll call | 452 for, 166 against, 23 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
Show the other 80 votesShow the other 78 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 3 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 2 – Am 4/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘respect for the rule of law’, ‘deriving from breaches of the rule of law’, ‘against violations of the other values enshrined in Article 2 TEU’, ‘breaches of democracy, equality and fundamental rights, which can have’, ‘such’ and ‘of other Article 2 TEU values’” | Roll call | 452 for, 166 against, 23 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 2 – Am 4/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 413 for, 210 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 5 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 6 | Amendment 16 to paragraph 3 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 3 – Am 16 | Roll call | 412 for, 228 against, 12 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 7 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 8 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 9 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 | Counted | 276 for, 348 against, 29 abstained Rejected | |
| 10 | Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 3 – Am 54 | Roll call | 388 for, 213 against, 44 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 11 | Separate vote on paragraph 12 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 12 | Separate vote on paragraph 14 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 13 | Separate vote on paragraph 14 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 14 | Separate vote on paragraph 20 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew |
| 15 | Separate vote on paragraph 20 | Show of hands | Lapsed | Requested bysplit: Renew |
| 16 | Separate vote on paragraph 20 | Show of hands | Lapsed | Requested bysplit: Renew |
| 17 | Separate vote on paragraph 23 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 18 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 25 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 25 – Am 5 | Roll call | 234 for, 385 against, 28 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 19 | Amendment 17 to paragraph 25 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 25 – Am 17 | Roll call | 439 for, 181 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 20 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 6 | Roll call | 277 for, 349 against, 19 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 21 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 7 | Roll call | 412 for, 217 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 22 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 8/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘not’, ‘solely’, ‘since it also allows for partial suspensions at an early stage, namely as soon as rule of law breaches that could seriously risk affecting the EU budget have been identified’ and ‘full and’” | Roll call | 511 for, 106 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 23 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 8/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 416 for, 206 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 24 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 9/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘measures adopted in accordance with Article 6 of the Financial Regulation, and pending conditionality screenings, so that the Member States cannot exploit procedural silos and’ and ‘regardless of the legal instrument used’” | Roll call | 532 for, 89 against, 29 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 25 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 9/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 434 for, 204 against, 9 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 26 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 10/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘its warning’, ‘or objectives’, ‘EU financial interests to already determined risks; believes that the spirit of the Conditionality Regulation precludes’, ‘and therefore urges the Commission to reject any requests for transfer’, ‘that would lead to a circumvention of measures under the Conditionality Regulation’, and ‘not follow, the Commission decision’” | Roll call | 513 for, 110 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 27 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 10/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 426 for, 205 against, 8 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 28 | Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 55/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘civil society organisations, non-governmental organisations and trade unions in monitoring’, ‘use of Union funds, reporting suspected fraud, supporting whistleblowers and providing independent scrutiny that complements the work of’, ‘rejects any attempt to instrumentalise’, ‘to justify generalised restrictions on civil society;’, ‘disproportionate restrictions on civil society organisations’,” | Roll call | 556 for, 82 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots |
| 29 | Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 25 – Am 55/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 275 for, 331 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots |
| 30 | Separate vote on paragraph 29 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 31 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 31 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 31 – Am 11 | Roll call | 302 for, 323 against, 22 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 32 | Separate vote on paragraph 32 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 33 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 32 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 34 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 32 – Am 12 | Roll call | 451 for, 179 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 35 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 32 – Am 13 | Roll call | 315 for, 310 against, 20 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 36 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 32 | Roll call | 0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed | |
| 37 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 32 – Am 14 | Roll call | 527 for, 99 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 38 | Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 32 – Am 60 | Roll call | 399 for, 232 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 39 | Separate vote on paragraph 33 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 40 | Separate vote on paragraph 40 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 41 | Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After § 40 – Am 64 | Roll call | 614 for, 22 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Members |
| 42 | Separate vote on paragraph 41 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 43 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 43 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 44 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 43 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 45 | Separate vote on paragraph 47 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 46 | Separate vote on paragraph 53 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 47 | Amendment 18 to paragraph 53 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 53 – Am 18 | Roll call | 272 for, 357 against, 16 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 48 | Separate vote on paragraph 53 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 49 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 50 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 51 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 | Roll call | 0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed | |
| 52 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 | Roll call | 0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed | |
| 53 | Separate vote on paragraph 55 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 54 | Separate vote on paragraph 55 | Roll call | 0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed | |
| 55 | Separate vote on paragraph 58 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 56 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 61 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 57 | Separate vote on paragraph 63 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 58 | Separate vote on paragraph 68 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 59 | Separate vote on paragraph 70 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 60 | Amendment 21 to paragraph 71 — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 71 – Am 21/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘civil society and humanitarian action’” | Roll call | 541 for, 36 against, 74 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew; split: Patriots |
| 61 | Amendment 21 to paragraph 71 — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 71 – Am 21/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 302 for, 238 against, 91 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew; split: Patriots |
| 62 | Amendment 22 to paragraph 73 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 73 – Am 22 | Roll call | 468 for, 85 against, 75 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 63 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 74 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 74 – Am 28 | Roll call | 114 for, 501 against, 27 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 64 | Amendment 23 to paragraph 74 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 74 – Am 23 | Roll call | 483 for, 111 against, 50 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 65 | Amendment 29 to paragraph 76 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 76 – Am 29 | Roll call | 134 for, 480 against, 19 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 66 | Amendment 24 to paragraph 77 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – § 77 – Am 24 | Roll call | 485 for, 77 against, 66 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Renew |
| 67 | Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After citation 21 – Am 1= 25= | Roll call | 301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 68 | Vote on text inserted after citation 25 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 69 | Vote on text inserted after citation 25 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 70 | Amendment 2, adding text after Recital B — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After Recital B – Am 2/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘relationship between respect for the rule of law and the efficient implementation of the EU budget, in accordance with the’” | Roll call | 527 for, 97 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 71 | Amendment 2, adding text after Recital B — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After Recital B – Am 2/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 427 for, 201 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 72 | Amendment 3, adding text after Recital B — part 1 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After Recital B – Am 3/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘breaches of the rule of law in a Member State affect, or seriously’, ‘notably because of attempts by some of the Member States to link the negotiations on the MFF with the negotiations on the rule of law conditionality mechanism’” | Roll call | 453 for, 171 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 73 | Amendment 3, adding text after Recital B — part 2 A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – After Recital B – Am 3/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 409 for, 199 against, 20 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 74 | Separate vote on recital E | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 75 | Separate vote on recital G | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 76 | Separate vote on recital H | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 77 | Separate vote on recital O | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 78 | Separate vote on recital Q | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew |
| 79 | Separate vote on recital Q | Show of hands | Lapsed | Requested bysplit: Renew |
| 80 | Separate vote on recital Q | Show of hands | Lapsed | Requested bysplit: Renew |
| 81 | Final vote — text as a whole A10-0080/2026 – Julien Sanchez – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) | Roll call | 231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected |
Roll calls requested by Greens, S&D, Renew, ESN, Members · split votes by Renew (2), Patriots (12).
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
The resolution concerns the protection of the EU's financial interests and the fight against fraud, based on the Commission's 2024 annual report.
Parliament rejected the text, meaning it does not adopt the proposed resolution.
The text had called for stronger anti-fraud measures, including better detection, prevention, and use of digital tools.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
This resolution concerns the protection of the EU's financial interests and the fight against fraud, based on the Commission's 2024 annual report. It calls for improved transparency, digitalisation, and cooperation among anti-fraud authorities.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2025/2238(INI) · Own-initiative report
Parliament rejected the text on 28 April 2026; no position was adopted.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 27 November 2025 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 5 March 2026 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 30 March 2026 (done)
- Plenary vote · Rejected 28 April 2026 (done)
- Parliament’s position · No text adopted (done)
Lead committee: CONT · Author: Julien SANCHEZ (Patriots)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 21 connections: Running issue: EU funds misuse · Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way
Running issue: EU funds misuse
- Issue EU funds misuse Running issue · Crisis 20 May 2026
- Decision Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Resolution · motion for a resolution 20 May 2026 Adopted
- Decision Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments Resolution · report by Monika Hohlmeier 28 Apr 2026 Adopted
- Decision Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Resolution · report by Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier 18 Dec 2025 Adopted
- Decision Amending certain CAP Regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties New EU law · report by André Rodrigues 16 Dec 2025 Passed
- Decision Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties New EU law · report by André Rodrigues 8 Oct 2025 Passed
Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers
- Decision Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Resolution · report by Dick Erixon 28 Apr 2026 Adopted
- Decision Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments Resolution · report by Monika Hohlmeier 28 Apr 2026 Adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission Budget decision · report by Daniel Freund 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament Budget decision · report by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and Council Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Auditors Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action Service Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
- Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Ombudsman Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Final votes that split the chamber the same way
- Decision General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections Budget decision · committee report 23 Oct 2024 Resolution rejected
- Decision Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 Resolution · report by Joachim Streit 7 Jul 2026 Adopted
- Decision Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Resolution · motion for a resolution 18 Jun 2026 Adopted
- Decision Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Resolution · report by Gheorghe Falcă 22 May 2025 Adopted
- Decision Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group New EU law · report by Emma Wiesner, Pekka Toveri 21 Oct 2025 Passed
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024”. Decision, 28 April 2026. votingId 190161, document A-10-2026-0080, reference 2025/2238(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/12 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-28-12,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-04-28},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/12}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/12},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 190161, document A-10-2026-0080, reference 2025/2238(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}