Skip to content

Decision

Clean Industrial Deal

Effect
Adopted
Result
381 for · 173 against · 13 abstained roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:26–13:34
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Economy & single marketClimate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
55 votes · 33 roll calls · 28 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 5 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call) · Members (1 roll call)
Final vote
177454
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 381 for, 173 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 28 amendments (28 rejected) and 25 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted, 14 rejected). 1 alternative motion lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 1No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 0Abst. 2No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 130Against 2Abst. 1No vote 55 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 31Against 23Abst. 8No vote 17 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
PatriotsFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 14 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 19Abst. 0No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 7

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria115040.53
Belgium135040.58
Bulgaria93140.54
Cyprus2004—
Czechia87060.30
Germany48242220.47
Denmark112110.68
Estonia6100—
Spain3381180.68
Finland63150.40
France32344110.23
Greece550110.25
Croatia9003—
Hungary711030.42
Ireland93020.63
Italy44140180.64
Lithuania100011.00
Luxembourg4101—
Latvia6102—
Malta4002—
Netherlands225040.72
Poland2322080.27
Portugal126030.50
Romania1822110.73
Sweden154020.68
Slovenia7011—
Slovakia77010.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 567 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&DSpeeches119 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Younous OMARJEE FranceThe LeftSpeeches218 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Paolo BORCHIA ItalyPatriotsSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Christophe GRUDLER FranceRenewSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPPSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES SpainS&DSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Show the other 6 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Tom BERENDSEN NetherlandsEPPSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sara MATTHIEU BelgiumGreensSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Anja ARNDT GermanyESNSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Per CLAUSEN DenmarkThe LeftSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Daniel OBAJTEK PolandECRSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECRSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against

All votes on this decision, 55

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Separate vote on paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
2Amendment 32 to paragraph 1 B10-0277/2025 – § 1 – Am 32 Roll call168 for, 389 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
3Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 2 B10-0277/2025 – After § 2 – Am 14 Roll call134 for, 410 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Show the other 54 votesShow the other 52 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 32 to paragraph 1 B10-0277/2025 – § 1 – Am 32 Roll call168 for, 389 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
3Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 2 B10-0277/2025 – After § 2 – Am 14 Roll call134 for, 410 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 B10-0277/2025 – After § 2 – Am 33 Roll call178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
5Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 2 B10-0277/2025 – After § 2 – Am 34 Roll call181 for, 386 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Patriots
6Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 2 B10-0277/2025 – After § 2 – Am 38 Roll call186 for, 378 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
7Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 2 B10-0277/2025 – After § 2 – Am 41 Roll call166 for, 367 against, 42 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR, Greens
8Amendment 4 to paragraph 3 B10-0277/2025 – § 3 – Am 4 Roll call50 for, 503 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
9Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
10Paragraph 5 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Highlights the need to finalise work on the revision of the Energy Taxation Directive , which aims to align the taxation of energy products with the EU’s energy and climate policy objectives, and to harmonise a design of tariff methodologies for network charges, provided that such measures do not come at the expense of final consumers;’Show of hands RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
11Paragraph 5 — part 1 B10-0277/2025 – § 5/1 Part voted on: ‘Highlights the need to finalise work on the revision of the Energy Taxation Directive , which aims to align the taxation of energy products with the EU’s energy and climate policy objectives, and to harmonise a design of tariff methodologies for network charges, provided that such measures do not come at the expense of final consumers;’Roll call381 for, 151 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
12Paragraph 5 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Member States to urgently provide short-term relief to industry and households, for example by reducing electricity taxes and levies and abstaining from unjustified additional requirements (‘gold-plating’ EU legislation) where this distorts the level playing field;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
13Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 5 B10-0277/2025 – After § 5 – Am 15 Roll call168 for, 393 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
14Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 B10-0277/2025 – After § 6 – Am 7 Roll call100 for, 397 against, 71 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
15Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 B10-0277/2025 – After § 6 – Am 8 Roll call106 for, 437 against, 30 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
16Amendment 16 to paragraph 7 B10-0277/2025 – § 7 – Am 16 Roll call156 for, 392 against, 27 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
17Amendment 9 to paragraph 8 B10-0277/2025 – § 8 – Am 9 Roll call74 for, 476 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
18Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 B10-0277/2025 – § 8 – Am 30 Roll call166 for, 391 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Members, S&D
19Amendment 17 to paragraph 8 B10-0277/2025 – § 8 – Am 17 Roll call173 for, 397 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
20Separate vote on paragraph 8 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
21Paragraph 8 — part 2 B10-0277/2025 – § 8/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call389 for, 168 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
22Amendment 42 to paragraph 9 B10-0277/2025 – § 9 – Am 42 Roll call175 for, 387 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
23Paragraph 11 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in the short to medium term’”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Patriots
24Paragraph 11 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
25Paragraph 11 — part 2 B10-0277/2025 – § 11/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call378 for, 177 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
26Amendment 11 to paragraph 12 B10-0277/2025 – § 12 – Am 11 Roll call78 for, 485 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
27Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12 Show of hands Rejected
28Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12 Show of hands Rejected
29Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 12 B10-0277/2025 – After § 12 – Am 20 Roll call62 for, 497 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
30Separate vote on paragraph 13 Show of hands Rejected
31Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13 Show of hands Rejected
32Amendment 18 to paragraph 14 B10-0277/2025 – § 14 – Am 18 Roll call129 for, 386 against, 56 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
33Amendment 23 to paragraph 14 B10-0277/2025 – § 14 – Am 23 Roll call96 for, 419 against, 57 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
34Amendment 43 to paragraph 14 B10-0277/2025 – § 14 – Am 43 Roll call196 for, 360 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
35Paragraph 14 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘sustainability and’ and ‘supports the creation of voluntary carbon intensity labels for industrial products (e.g. for steel and cement), which should reflect carbon performance rather than process bias, and alignment with existing EU legislation, including the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the Construction Products Regulation;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
36Paragraph 14 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
37Amendment 24 to paragraph 15 B10-0277/2025 – § 15 – Am 24 Roll call101 for, 424 against, 48 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
38Separate vote on paragraph 16 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Patriots
39Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 16 B10-0277/2025 – After § 16 – Am 25 Roll call74 for, 478 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
40Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 B10-0277/2025 – After § 16 – Am 26 Roll call70 for, 476 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
41Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 16 B10-0277/2025 – After § 16 – Am 27 Roll call67 for, 480 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
42Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 B10-0277/2025 – § 17 – Am 35 Roll call170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
43Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 B10-0277/2025 – After § 17 – Am 36 Roll call180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
44Vote on text inserted after paragraph 19 Show of hands Rejected
45Vote on text inserted after paragraph 19 Show of hands Rejected
46Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 B10-0277/2025 – After § 20 – Am 37 Roll call184 for, 371 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
47Separate vote on recital A Show of hands Rejected
48Separate vote on recital B Show of hands Rejected
49Vote on text inserted after recital C Show of hands Rejected
50Separate vote on recital D Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Patriots
51Separate vote on recital D Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
52Separate vote on recital D Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
53Amendment 31, adding text after recital D B10-0277/2025 – After recital D – Am 31 Roll call183 for, 380 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
54Final vote — text as a whole B10-0277/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call381 for, 173 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP, Patriots
55Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0278/2025 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN, Members · split votes by Patriots (5) · separate votes by Patriots.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2025-0278

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the Commission's Clean Industrial Deal, a roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation.

The adopted text expresses concern about the Deal's potential ineffectiveness and calls for suspending economically harmful Green Deal policies.

It urges the Commission to revise or repeal Green Deal legislation and to avoid proposing a 90% net greenhouse gas reduction target for 2040.

Parliament also stresses the need for a diversified energy mix, including natural gas, and for technology-neutral approaches.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution responds to the Commission's Clean Industrial Deal, expressing concern about its potential ineffectiveness and calling for a change of pace, including suspending Green Deal policies and revising or repealing related legislation.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2656(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 19 June 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 19 June 2025 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ITRE · Author: MEP #197778 (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 20 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Running issue: EU climate neutrality · Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Running issue: EU climate neutrality

Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Clean Industrial Deal”. Decision, 19 June 2025. votingId 177454, document B-10-2025-0278, reference 2025/2656(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-19/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-06-19-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Clean Industrial Deal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-19/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-19/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 177454, document B-10-2025-0278, reference 2025/2656(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}