Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Security of energy supply in the EU

Effect
Adopted
Result
459 for · 170 against · 30 abstained roll call
Date
8 July 2025, 13:49–13:54
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Text
Report A-10-2025-0121
Dossier
2025/2055(INI)
Source
Committee report by Beata Szydło
Topics
Energy Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
25 votes · 25 roll calls · 9 amendments
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call) · Members (1 roll call, 4 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Sitting
Tuesday 8 July 2025
Final vote
177733
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 459 for, 170 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (9 rejected) and 15 parts of the text voted on separately (14 adopted, 1 rejected).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 1No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 43Against 3Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 115Against 5Abst. 3No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 71Against 2Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 159Against 4Abst. 2No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 69Against 2Abst. 4No vote 4 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 15No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 2Against 24Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 43

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria019011.00
Belgium145120.55
Bulgaria103310.44
Cyprus4110—
Czechia94710.17
Germany6326070.56
Denmark122010.79
Estonia7000—
Spain443760.72
Finland111120.77
France2938680.28
Greece810030.33
Croatia120001.00
Hungary112080.88
Ireland113000.68
Italy5515060.68
Lithuania100100.86
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia7101—
Malta5001—
Netherlands246010.70
Poland436040.82
Portugal142230.67
Romania262140.84
Sweden192000.86
Slovenia9000—
Slovakia78000.30

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 659 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECRSpeeches18 Jul 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ RomaniaGreensSpeeches18 Jul 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 25

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – After § 2 – Am 3 Roll call202 for, 435 against, 37 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
2Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – After § 2 – Am 4 Roll call209 for, 407 against, 51 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
3Separate vote on paragraph 4 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 4 Roll call505 for, 115 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: Members
Show the other 24 votesShow the other 22 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – After § 2 – Am 4 Roll call209 for, 407 against, 51 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
3Separate vote on paragraph 4 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 4 Roll call505 for, 115 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: Members
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 6 – Am 5 Roll call145 for, 439 against, 87 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
5Paragraph 7 — part 1 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 7/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘non-fossil’, ‘and biomass’ and ‘in a transition period; draws attention to the important role that the optimal use of high-efficiency cogeneration, in line with the Energy Efficiency Directive, can play in contributing to balancing the electricity grid and to the competitiveness of some industrial sectors, especially those that do not have alternative ways of producing affordable heat in their industrial processes; stresses the need to modernise and expand district heating grids to this end;’”Roll call572 for, 19 against, 79 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
6Paragraph 7 — part 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 7/2 Part voted on: “and biomass”Roll call146 for, 487 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
7Paragraph 7 — part 3 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 7/3 Part voted on: ‘non-fossil’ and ‘in a transition period; draws attention to the important role that the optimal use of high-efficiency cogeneration, in line with the Energy Efficiency Directive, can play in contributing to balancing the electricity grid and to the competitiveness of some industrial sectors, especially those that do not have alternative ways of producing affordable heat in their industrial processes; stresses the need to modernise and expand district heating grids to this end;’Roll call481 for, 115 against, 71 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
8Paragraph 10 — part 1 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 10/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘with increasing penetration of renewables’”Roll call600 for, 65 against, 6 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
9Paragraph 10 — part 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 10/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call506 for, 137 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
10Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – After § 12 – Am 6 Roll call212 for, 420 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
11Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 13 – Am 7 Roll call204 for, 424 against, 41 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
12Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 15 – Am 8 Roll call200 for, 424 against, 42 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
13Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – After § 20 – Am 9 Roll call198 for, 434 against, 37 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
14Paragraph 49 — part 1 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 49/1 Part voted on: “Highlights that energy efficiency plays a critical role in enhancing the security of energy supply by reducing overall energy demand, lowering dependency on energy imports and increasing system resilience; considers that the new security of supply framework should be broadened to reflect a new way of looking at the security of energy supply, based not only on energy sources, but also on the energy efficiency first principle, energy savings, cost efficiency, as well as the ability to produce different types of energy domestically;”Roll call529 for, 106 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
15Paragraph 49 — part 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 49/2 Part voted on: ‘notes that, in the near-term, the Union should concentrate on effective and solid weaning of Russian energy imports without loopholes, including through securing alternatives supplies from reliable partners and better use of existing infrastructure, while in parallel continuing to develop domestic alternatives to imported energy products, where possible; stresses, nevertheless, the imperative to develop a future-proof security of supply architecture that systematically reduces dependence on external actors, notably by advancing energy efficiency, promoting energy savings, enhancing circularity and ensuring the sustained growth of home-grown clean energy production and well-protected decentralised energy infrastructure;’ without the words: ‘advancing energy efficiency, promoting energy savings’Roll call519 for, 71 against, 71 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
16Paragraph 49 — part 3 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – § 49/3 Part voted on: “advancing energy efficiency, promoting energy savings”Roll call535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
17Separate vote on citation 8 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Citation 8 Roll call504 for, 148 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members
18Separate vote on citation 11 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Citation 11 Roll call488 for, 169 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: Members
19Separate vote on citation 19 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Citation 19 Roll call500 for, 128 against, 39 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members
20Amendment 1 to recital D A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Recital D – Am 1 Roll call198 for, 428 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
21Amendment 2 to recital E A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Recital E – Am 2 Roll call202 for, 425 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Members
22Recital I — part 1 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Recital I/1 Part voted on: ‘whereas applying renewable and clean domestic energy production, energy efficiency and energy saving measures across the entire value chain decreases reliance on external energy sources and enhances the security of energy supply;’ without the words ‘renewable and’Roll call544 for, 41 against, 80 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
23Recital I — part 2 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Recital I/2 Part voted on: “renewable and”Roll call524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
24Recital I — part 3 A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Recital I/3 Part voted on: “whereas EU energy efficiency policies have yielded structural results, with energy demand peaking in 2006 and declining by 20 % in 2023, highlighting energy efficiency as the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions, enhance competitiveness, make energy consumption more affordable and improve energy security;”Roll call474 for, 141 against, 53 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Members
25Final vote — text as a whole A10-0121/2025 – Beata Szydło – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call459 for, 170 against, 30 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Greens, Members · split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0121

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the security of energy supply in the EU, setting out its position on the topic.

The text calls for a reassessment of EU energy policy, including a phase-out of all energy imports from Russia and stronger coordination among member states.

It also stresses the need to protect critical infrastructure and adapt to climate risks.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The report sets out a new vision for EU energy security, stressing resilience, diversification, and the phase-out of Russian energy imports by 2027.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2055(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 8 July 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 13 March 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 25 June 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 30 June 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 8 July 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ITRE · Author: Beata SZYDŁO (ECR)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 13 connections: Running issue: EU economic security · Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU economic security

Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-07-08/8
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Security of energy supply in the EU”. Decision, 8 July 2025. votingId 177733, document A-10-2025-0121, reference 2025/2055(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-07-08/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2025-07-08-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Security of energy supply in the EU}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-07-08/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-07-08/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 177733, document A-10-2025-0121, reference 2025/2055(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}