Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mārtiņš STAĶIS
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Mārtiņš STAĶIS only. Show every member
Mārtiņš STAĶIS’s votes against the line, 124
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 73, adding text after recital H The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital F — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 58 to recital E The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 57, adding text after recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 55 to recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 72, adding text after recital B The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime | For | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 80 to recital CL Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 80 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 80 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 82 to paragraph 65 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 20 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 4 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 4 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | Greens |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 15 to recital K Joint communication on humanitarian aid | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | Greens |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 41 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 13 Competition policy – annual report 2025 | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 25 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 9 to paragraph 21 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
Show all 124 votes
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote Temporary support and payment of advances regarding the increased fertiliser prices due to the Middle East crisis | For | Against | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Recital B — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | For | Against | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | Against | Abstained | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crime | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crime | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crime | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Vote on text inserted after recital C Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point k Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 38 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on Albania | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on Albania | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Against | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | For | Against | Greens |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | Greens |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | Greens |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 37 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendments 27 + 39 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ag Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendments 23 + 37 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 59 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 56 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 20 May 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision United Nations Convention against Cybercrime | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 18 May 2026 | Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine | For | Against | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities | Against | For | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 87 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 51 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 49 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 47 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | For | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Norway Agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Iceland agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 33 Discharge 2024: Agencies | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 45 to paragraph 33 Discharge 2024: Agencies | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 27 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action Service | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 26 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action Service | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 53 to paragraph 173 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 172 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 51 to paragraph 171 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 36 to paragraph 9 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 20 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Against | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferences | Against | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 48 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 43 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Against | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 40 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 40 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 71 to paragraph 27 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 70 to paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 55 to paragraph 7 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Against | Abstained | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 26 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation | Against | For | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Motion for adjournment of vote Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Motion for adjournment of vote Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | Abstained | Against | Greens |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mārtiņš STAĶIS , Greens · Latvia | 7.2 % | 1 711 | 43 | 75 | 6 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256916&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mārtiņš STAĶIS”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256916&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mārtiņš STAĶIS}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256916&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256916&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}