Separate vote: recital U · Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 43	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 45	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 1	Against 43	Abst. 4	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.84
S&D	For 120	Against 2	Abst. 6	No vote 8 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.91
Renew	For 67	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 162	Against 2	Abst. 5	No vote 16 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
ECR	For 49	Against 26	Abst. 2	No vote 4 of 81	Majority line For	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.45
Patriots	For 0	Against 79	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 0	Against 25	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 20	Against 6	Abst. 3	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	3–1–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	2–0–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	2–0–1
Germany	0–4–0	0–14–0	13–0–0	9–0–0	30–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–0	7–0–0
Denmark	0–1–0	0–0–3	3–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–3–0	20–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–8–0	0–4–0	13–0–0	12–0–0	5–0–0	0–4–0	0–29–0	0–1–0	1–0–0
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–1
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–0–5	no member voted	0–9–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–10–0	0–4–0	19–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	24–0–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–0–1	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–5–0	3–1–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	23–0–0	2–16–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	7–0–0	2–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	4–0–6	2–0–0	7–0–0	5–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–1
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Belgium	0	2	0
Cyprus	0	1	0
Germany	0	4	0
Denmark	0	1	0
Spain	0	4	0
Finland	0	3	0
France	0	8	0
Greece	0	3	0
Ireland	0	2	0
Italy	0	10	0
Netherlands	0	1	0
Portugal	0	2	0
Sweden	0	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Bas EICKHOUT group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Biljana BORZAN group that day: S&D · Croatia
Branko GRIMS group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Carla TAVARES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Csaba BOGDÁN group that day: EPP · Hungary
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Elisabetta GUALMINI group that day: Renew · Italy
Emil RADEV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Eugen TOMAC group that day: Renew · Romania
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Friedrich PÜRNER group that day: No group · Germany
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Gerald HAUSER group that day: Patriots · Austria
Gheorghe FALCĂ group that day: EPP · Romania
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Irena JOVEVA group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Ivaylo VALCHEV group that day: ECR · Bulgaria
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Luke Ming FLANAGAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marko VEŠLIGAJ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE group that day: EPP · Spain
Norbert HERHAMMER group that day: EPP · Germany
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: S&D · Italy
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Sophia KIRCHER group that day: EPP · Austria
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Udo BULLMANN group that day: S&D · Germany
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ group that day: EPP · Slovenia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
25 Nov 2025	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector	Final	426 for, 182 against, 39 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.81 599 voters
28 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture	Final	430 for, 107 against, 115 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.81 610 voters
9 Sept 2025	Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Amendment	444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.80 595 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
11 Feb 2025	Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024	Final	378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted	For 59 %		r · shared0.80 582 voters
9 Sept 2025	Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Final	431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.79 600 voters
21 May 2026	Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures	Final	294 for, 192 against, 90 abstained Adopted	For 51 %	Requested by Greens, The Left	r · shared0.78 540 voters
21 May 2026	Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation	Final	294 for, 194 against, 86 abstained Adopted	For 51 %	Requested by Greens, The Left	r · shared0.77 539 voters
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 12 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Split vote	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted	For 71 %		r · shared0.77 561 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 16 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	424 for, 157 against, 42 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by EPP	r · shared0.76 581 voters
7 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system	Final	390 for, 86 against, 134 abstained Adopted	For 64 %		r · shared0.76 568 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Resolution · report by Lukas Mandl 16 Jun 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 11 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 15 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Recital G — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 6 to recital Q Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital U — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194345, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194345,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital U — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194345},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194345, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}