Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Matej TONIN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Matej TONIN only. Show every member

Matej TONIN’s votes against the line, 118

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstEPP
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedForEPP
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 94313ForAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6ForAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Recital B — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAbstainedEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 80 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to recital B The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to recital E Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to recital E Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to recital C — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to recital C — part 1 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 1 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 1 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAbstainedForEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAbstainedForEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineAgainstForEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 52 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 34 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 34 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership AgreementAbstainedForEPP
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeForAgainstEPP
18 Jun 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAbstainedAgainstEPP
18 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crimeForAbstainedEPP
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 73 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 17 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on MontenegroAbstainedForEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstEPP
Show all 118 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Jun 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 40 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 37 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendments 17 + 25 (voted as one) Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to recital AJ Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Recital AC — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAgainstForEPP
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAgainstForEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to recital Q Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Recital G — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAbstainedForEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
16 Jun 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedForEPP
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AH Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForEPP
21 May 2026Recital R — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForEPP
21 May 2026Recital A — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForEPP
21 May 2026Recital A — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedForEPP
21 May 2026Paragraph 49 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedForEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 28 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstForEPP
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstForEPP
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 21 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstForEPP
20 May 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseForAgainstEPP
20 May 2026Citation 5 — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point aq — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstForEPP
29 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 105 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 74 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 69 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 69 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 64 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 59 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 57 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 56 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 53 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AL — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AL — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 20 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAgainstForEPP
26 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potentialForAgainstEPP

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Matej TONIN , EPP · Slovenia 7.1 %1 664902620

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=219652&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Matej TONIN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=219652&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Matej TONIN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=219652&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=219652&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}