Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

A decision can have many votes: amendments, split parts, the final vote.

Roll-call votes

5 928 votes recorded by name

Export
More filters

A group’s line is counted with members in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote.

Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested bySelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by ECRSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The LeftSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&DSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The LeftSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The LeftSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 86 %Select
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 98 %Select
17 Sept 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&DSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 71 %Select
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersFinal601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 99 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital H Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 98 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by PatriotsSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upFinal368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAmendment141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The LeftSelect
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Greens, The LeftSelect
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 96 %Requested by Greens, EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greens, EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greens, EPPSelect
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by GreensSelect
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %Select
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 80 %Select
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 78 %Select
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 77 %Select
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 81 %Select