Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), after recital C

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), after recital C
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
204 for · 381 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 105 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After recital C – Am 14= 59=
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197177
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 3Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 5Against 56Abst. 2No vote 15 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 0Against 146Abst. 1No vote 37 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 5No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 594 members

No vote recorded, 123

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 123 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 527 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 528 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment200 for, 384 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.95 496 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 217 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 527 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 16 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment185 for, 364 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 482 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 52 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment216 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 533 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 210 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment209 for, 425 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 526 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 531 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 212 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment209 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 526 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 208 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment207 for, 430 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 533 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197177
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), after recital C — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197177, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197177 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197177,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), after recital C — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197177}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197177},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197177, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}