Vote · Roll call

Amendment 102, after paragraph 53

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote: Amendment 102, after paragraph 53
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result: 178 for · 463 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 15 September 2026, 13:14

More facts (6)

Position: vote 70 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – After § 53 – Am 102
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196272

Position: vote 70 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – After § 53 – Am 102
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196272

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 40	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 49	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 0	Against 123	Abst. 0	No vote 12 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 0	Against 70	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 1	Against 170	Abst. 2	No vote 11 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
ECR	For 74	Against 4	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.92
Patriots	For 62	Against 0	Abst. 10	No vote 12 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.79
ESN	For 27	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 14	Against 7	Abst. 6	No vote 1 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	4–0–0	6–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–2–0	0–14–0	0–14–0	0–7–0	0–30–0	no member voted	no member voted	15–0–0	1–2–5
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–22–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	0–5–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	0–5–0	4–0–0	26–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	0–0–10	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–10–0	0–3–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–9–0	23–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	2–1–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–22–0	16–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–7–0	0–3–0	0–7–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–2	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Abst.
Austria	6	0
Belgium	3	0
Czechia	6	0
Denmark	1	0
Spain	6	0
France	26	0
Greece	1	0
Hungary	0	10
Italy	5	0
Latvia	1	0
Netherlands	5	0
Poland	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 659 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Ana Miguel PEDRO group that day: EPP · Portugal
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Andrey NOVAKOV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Anthony SMITH group that day: The Left · France
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Christian DOLESCHAL group that day: EPP · Germany
Christine SINGER group that day: Renew · Germany
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Georgia TRAMACERE group that day: S&D · Italy
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Grégory ALLIONE group that day: Renew · France
Hana JALLOUL MURO group that day: S&D · Spain
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Ignazio Roberto MARINO group that day: Greens · Italy
Isabella TOVAGLIERI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Jaak MADISON group that day: ECR · Estonia
Jacek OZDOBA group that day: ECR · Poland
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klára DOBREV group that day: S&D · Hungary
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Marcos ROS SEMPERE group that day: S&D · Spain
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mélanie DISDIER group that day: Patriots · France
Michael MCNAMARA group that day: Renew · Ireland
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mieke ANDRIESE group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: Renew · Italy
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Sebastião BUGALHO group that day: EPP · Portugal
Sergey LAGODINSKY group that day: Greens · Germany
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Virginie JORON group that day: Patriots · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	Amendment	200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 597 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Amendment	195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.97 577 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	Amendment	188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 605 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025	Amendment	195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.97 575 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report	Amendment	196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by S&D, ECR	r · shared0.97 576 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 15 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	188 for, 470 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 611 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Amendment	186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.97 598 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025	Amendment	189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.97 576 voters
20 May 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response	Amendment	201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.97 592 voters
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 96 to Article 7, after paragraph 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Amendment	194 for, 467 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.97 649 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures New EU law · report by Mohammed Chahim 15 Sept 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 87 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 103 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 126 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 128 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 102, after paragraph 53 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196272, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196272,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 102, after paragraph 53 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196272, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}