Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 102, after paragraph 53

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote
Amendment 102, after paragraph 53
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
178 for · 463 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 70 of 72 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – After § 53 – Am 102
Text
Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier
2025/0419(COD)
Vote id
196272
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 178 for, 463 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 170Abst. 2No vote 11 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 74Against 4Abst. 0No vote 6 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 10No vote 12 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 6No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 659 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 597 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 577 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 605 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 575 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.97 576 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment188 for, 470 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 611 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 598 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 576 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 592 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 96 to Article 7, after paragraph 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment194 for, 467 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 649 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 102, after paragraph 53 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196272, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196272,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 102, after paragraph 53 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196272},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196272, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}