Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital AC — part 2

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote
Recital AC — part 2
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2026
Result
442 for · 178 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 26 of 29 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members (a) · split vote: Members (a)
Official label
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AC/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier
2025/2111(INI)
Vote id
194351
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 442 for, 178 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and developing legal migration pathways;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 1Abst. 1No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 62Against 6Abst. 0No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 154Against 16Abst. 0No vote 15 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 0Against 37Abst. 41No vote 3 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 14Abst. 4No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece300
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 539 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.91 601 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.90 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 4 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote430 for, 201 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.89 594 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 533 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 593 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote444 for, 195 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.89 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 601 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.88 586 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 587 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AC — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194351, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194351,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AC — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194351, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}