Skip to content

Decision

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Effect
Adopted
Result
344 for · 237 against · 66 abstained roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:51–13:56
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Lukas Mandl
Topics
Foreign affairsMigration & asylum Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
29 votes · 15 roll calls · 9 amendments
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call) · Members (1 separate vote) · Members (b) (4 split votes) · Members (a) (1 roll call, 4 split votes)
Final vote
194357
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 344 for, 237 against, 66 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (1 adopted, 8 rejected) and 19 parts of the text voted on separately (19 adopted).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by The Left, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 2No vote 1 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 5No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 65Against 1Abst. 2No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 104Against 32Abst. 21No vote 28 of 185Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ECRFor 1Against 48Abst. 27No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 10

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria115040.53
Belgium135220.47
Bulgaria115010.53
Cyprus3201—
Czechia614010.55
Germany6515880.61
Denmark94200.40
Estonia5101—
Spain25121850.18
Finland104010.57
France2846160.42
Greece99030.25
Croatia7104—
Hungary290100.73
Ireland93020.63
Italy31172350.15
Lithuania72110.55
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia5400—
Malta4002—
Netherlands218110.55
Poland546020.85
Portugal164010.70
Romania137670.25
Sweden156000.57
Slovenia3303—
Slovakia64410.14

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Lukas MANDL AustriaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 29

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 Roll call150 for, 474 against, 47 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
2Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 1 – Am 9 Roll call224 for, 404 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Separate vote on paragraph 11 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (a)
Show the other 28 votesShow the other 26 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 1 – Am 9 Roll call224 for, 404 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Separate vote on paragraph 11 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (a)
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 11 — part 2 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 11/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call455 for, 211 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (a); split: Members (a)
5Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 15 – Am 10 Roll call234 for, 423 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
6Separate vote on paragraph 15 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (a)
7Paragraph 15 — part 2 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 15/2 Part voted on: “as well as by providing safer alternatives through the creation of legal channels for safe and regular migration and labour mobility; underlines that strict border control without alternative legal pathways for migration shifts migration routes, introducing different steps into the journey and new transit countries, thus increasing the precariousness of the journey and the exposure of migrants to smuggling networks, extortion and violence”Roll call253 for, 165 against, 214 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (a); split: Members (a)
8Separate vote on paragraph 17 Show of hands Adopted
9Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 18 – Am 4 Roll call431 for, 223 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
10Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 25 – Am 11 Roll call222 for, 429 against, 14 abstained Rejected
11Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 33 – Am 12 Roll call244 for, 410 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
12Recital B — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas applicants for international protection can remain in the Member States responsible, pending a decision on their application;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
13Recital B — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
14Separate vote on recital G Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (a)
15Recital G — part 2 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital G/2 Part voted on: “whereas a majority of migrants coming to Europe arrive through legal channels; whereas SDG 10 target 7 calls for countries to facilitate the orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people through planned and well-managed migration policies”Roll call438 for, 182 against, 50 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (a); split: Members (a)
16Recital I — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas acceptance rates for asylum seekers from these countries vary considerably;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
17Recital I — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted348 for, 304 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
18Separate vote on recital J Counted408 for, 200 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
19Recital K — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘124 000 non-EU citizens were refused entry into the EU, 919 000 were found without status,’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
20Recital K — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted341 for, 234 against, 91 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
21Amendment 6 to recital Q A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital Q – Am 6 Roll call236 for, 425 against, 7 abstained Rejected
22Recital S — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas, while economic and environmental drivers do not alone constitute grounds for asylum, they significantly contribute to vulnerability factors that may require an international comprehensive protection-oriented response;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
23Recital S — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted293 for, 205 against, 168 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (b)
24Separate vote on recital U A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital U Roll call419 for, 226 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (a)
25Separate vote on recital AC Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (a)
26Recital AC — part 2 A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AC/2 Part voted on: “and developing legal migration pathways;”Roll call442 for, 178 against, 46 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (a); split: Members (a)
27Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After recital AI – Am 7 Roll call218 for, 419 against, 30 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
28Amendment 8 to recital AJ A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AJ – Am 8 Roll call221 for, 426 against, 21 abstained Rejected
29Final vote — text as a whole A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call344 for, 237 against, 66 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Greens, S&D, Patriots, ESN, Members (a) · split votes by Members (b) (4), Members (a) (4) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0147

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries.

The text stresses that development policy should fight poverty while also tackling drivers of irregular migration, such as conflict, instability, and lack of opportunities.

It calls for policy coherence between development, migration, and security, and for cooperation based on verifiable results.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution addresses the link between development cooperation and irregular migration, calling for a coherent, human-rights-based approach that tackles root causes such as poverty, conflict, climate change and lack of opportunity.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2111(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 16 June 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 19 June 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 5 May 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 18 May 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 16 June 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: DEVE · Author: Lukas MANDL (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: Irregular migration to EU · Running issue: Migration and asylum pact · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Irregular migration to EU

Running issue: Migration and asylum pact

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Decision, 16 June 2026. votingId 194357, document A-10-2026-0147, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/12 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-16-12,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/12}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/12},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 194357, document A-10-2026-0147, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}