Vote · Roll call

Recital AC — part 2

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote: Recital AC — part 2
Decision: No. 12 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2026
Result: 442 for · 178 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 16 June 2026, 13:56

More facts (6)

Position: vote 26 of 29 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Members (a) · split vote: Members (a)
Official label: A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AC/2
Text: Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier: 2025/2111(INI)
Vote id: 194351

Position: vote 26 of 29 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Members (a) · split vote: Members (a)
Official label: A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AC/2
Text: Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier: 2025/2111(INI)
Vote id: 194351

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and developing legal migration pathways;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 44	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 45	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 47	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 124	Against 1	Abst. 1	No vote 10 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.98
Renew	For 62	Against 6	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.87
EPP	For 154	Against 16	Abst. 0	No vote 15 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.86
ECR	For 0	Against 37	Abst. 41	No vote 3 of 81	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.29
Patriots	For 0	Against 79	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 0	Against 25	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 11	Against 14	Abst. 4	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–3	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	0–3–0	2–0–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–3–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	0–3–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	30–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–0	7–0–0
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	2–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	3–0–0	20–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	0–0–2	0–5–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	4–0–0	13–0–0	12–0–0	1–4–0	0–4–0	0–29–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–3
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	1–5–0	no member voted	0–9–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	19–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	0–0–24	0–7–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–2	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–3	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	2–1–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	3–4–0	4–0–0	0–2–1	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	23–0–0	0–17–1	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	2–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–1	2–0–0	7–0–0	0–2–4	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	4–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–6–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Austria	5	0	0
Belgium	4	0	0
Bulgaria	2	0	0
Cyprus	1	0	0
Germany	14	0	0
Denmark	3	0	0
Estonia	2	0	0
Spain	20	0	0
Finland	2	0	0
France	13	0	0
Greece	4	0	0
Croatia	3	0	0
Hungary	2	0	0
Italy	19	0	0
Lithuania	2	0	0
Luxembourg	1	0	0
Latvia	1	0	0
Malta	2	1	0
Netherlands	4	0	0
Poland	3	0	0
Portugal	7	0	0
Romania	4	0	1
Sweden	5	0	0
Slovenia	1	0	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Bas EICKHOUT group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Biljana BORZAN group that day: S&D · Croatia
Branko GRIMS group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Carla TAVARES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Dragoş BENEA group that day: S&D · Romania
Elisabetta GUALMINI group that day: Renew · Italy
Eugen TOMAC group that day: Renew · Romania
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Friedrich PÜRNER group that day: No group · Germany
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Gerald HAUSER group that day: Patriots · Austria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Gheorghe FALCĂ group that day: EPP · Romania
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Irena JOVEVA group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE group that day: EPP · Spain
Norbert HERHAMMER group that day: EPP · Germany
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: S&D · Italy
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sophia KIRCHER group that day: EPP · Austria
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Ştefan MUŞOIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Vladimir PREBILIČ group that day: Greens · Slovenia
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Željana ZOVKO group that day: EPP · Croatia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
23 Oct 2025	Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit	Split vote	391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.91 539 voters
18 Jun 2025	Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report	Split vote	435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.91 601 voters
25 Nov 2025	Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded	Separate vote	418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	Requested by ESN, S&D	r · shared0.90 590 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
18 Jun 2025	Paragraph 47 — part 4 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report	Split vote	430 for, 201 against, 17 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.89 594 voters
23 Oct 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)	Separate vote	383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.89 533 voters
25 Nov 2025	Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded	Separate vote	418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.89 593 voters
18 Jun 2025	Paragraph 47 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report	Split vote	444 for, 195 against, 8 abstained Adopted	For 69 %		r · shared0.89 594 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.89 601 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.88 586 voters
29 Apr 2026	Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.88 587 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Resolution · report by Lukas Mandl 16 Jun 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 11 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 15 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Recital G — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 6 to recital Q Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AC — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194351, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194351,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AC — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194351},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194351, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}