Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 101 to article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendment 101 to article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2
Result
208 for · 323 against · 112 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:19
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, The Left
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, after point 2 – Am 101
Vote id
191250
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 208 for, 323 against, 112 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 59Against 4Abst. 58No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
RenewFor 18Against 8Abst. 38No vote 13 of 77Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
EPPFor 10Against 152Abst. 0No vote 23 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 6Against 73Abst. 2No vote 0 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 10Against 55Abst. 9No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 14Against 8Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
France010
Hungary001
Italy001
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.78 527 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.78 529 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 596 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 428 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 535 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.77 606 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment261 for, 379 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 597 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in LebanonOther181 for, 259 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 41 %r · shared0.77 410 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 42 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote290 for, 357 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.77 597 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 518 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 101 to article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2 — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191250, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191250 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191250,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 101 to article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2 — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191250}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191250},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191250, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}