Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 105 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendment 105 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b
Result
144 for · 384 against · 110 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 105
Vote id
191248
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 144 for, 384 against, 110 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 21Against 4Abst. 94No vote 16 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.68
RenewFor 9Against 54Abst. 2No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
EPPFor 6Against 156Abst. 0No vote 23 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 3Against 76Abst. 0No vote 2 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 3Against 64Abst. 6No vote 12 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 15Against 5Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany1260
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland130
France050
Greece060
Croatia040
Hungary030
Ireland040
Italy070
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland0220
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden410
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 423 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment138 for, 391 against, 107 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 578 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksAmendment86 for, 371 against, 120 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 519 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksAmendment89 for, 360 against, 120 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 510 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7 Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksAmendment83 for, 354 against, 110 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 488 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 417 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 436 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment228 for, 409 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 594 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment105 for, 430 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 584 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 432 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 105 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191248, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191248 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191248,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 105 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191248}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191248},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191248, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}