Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 96 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendment 96 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b
Result
166 for · 302 against · 178 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 96
Vote id
191247
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 166 for, 302 against, 178 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 2Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 32Against 6Abst. 83No vote 14 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.53
RenewFor 15Against 13Abst. 38No vote 11 of 77Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
EPPFor 7Against 154Abst. 0No vote 24 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 3Against 77Abst. 0No vote 1 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 4Against 21Abst. 50No vote 10 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.50
ESNFor 3Against 23Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 6No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.77 532 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment294 for, 334 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 601 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 29 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment258 for, 347 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 598 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote287 for, 278 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 561 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.75 531 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.75 529 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 579 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 429 voters
12 Mar 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Separate vote325 for, 294 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 600 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital N Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSeparate vote270 for, 287 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 533 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 96 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191247, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191247 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191247,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 96 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191247}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191247},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191247, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}