Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 53

Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 53
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
379 for · 180 against · 68 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 6 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0021/2026 – Irena Joveva, Mirosława Nykiel – § 53
Text
Report A-10-2026-0021
Dossier
2025/2038(INI)
Vote id
188834
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 379 for, 180 against, 68 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 46Against 8Abst. 15No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.50
EPPFor 110Against 41Abst. 11No vote 22 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
ECRFor 0Against 41Abst. 34No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 1No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 7No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentFinal360 for, 210 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 534 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AF Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote285 for, 198 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 461 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote307 for, 146 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 459 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2024 budget: assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budgetFinal389 for, 213 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.82 565 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.81 577 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.81 583 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AH Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote294 for, 144 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 456 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote248 for, 158 against, 114 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 468 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote367 for, 214 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 541 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote330 for, 244 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 538 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188834
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 53 — Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188834, reference 2025/2038(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188834 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188834,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 53 — Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188834}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188834},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188834, reference 2025/2038(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}