Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 2

Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 2
Result
377 for · 163 against · 70 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 6 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0021/2026 – Irena Joveva, Mirosława Nykiel – § 10/2
Vote id
188831
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 377 for, 163 against, 70 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 62 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 2Abst. 2No vote 16 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 73Against 51Abst. 32No vote 28 of 184Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
ECRFor 5Against 61Abst. 10No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 11Against 20Abst. 23No vote 30 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.14
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 1No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany610
France001
Greece310
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 610 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote414 for, 193 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.88 562 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 548 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 548 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote378 for, 197 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.87 543 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 538 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote358 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 551 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 548 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.86 556 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 473 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 492 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188831, reference 2025/2038(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188831 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188831,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188831}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188831},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188831, reference 2025/2038(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}