Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 1

Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors

Vote: Paragraph 10 — part 1
Decision: No. 6 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result: 449 for · 139 against · 39 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 11 March 2026, 12:56

More facts (6)

Position: vote 1 of 6 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label: A10-0021/2026 – Irena Joveva, Mirosława Nykiel – § 10/1
Text: Report A-10-2026-0021
Dossier: 2025/2038(INI)
Vote id: 188830

Position: vote 1 of 6 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label: A10-0021/2026 – Irena Joveva, Mirosława Nykiel – § 10/1
Text: Report A-10-2026-0021
Dossier: 2025/2038(INI)
Vote id: 188830

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including access to free, safe and legal abortion’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 43	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 47	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 119	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 16 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 67	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 76	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 150	Against 8	Abst. 3	No vote 23 of 184	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.90
ECR	For 3	Against 69	Abst. 4	No vote 5 of 81	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.86
Patriots	For 0	Against 32	Abst. 30	No vote 22 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.27
ESN	For 0	Against 24	Abst. 1	No vote 3 of 28	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 20	Against 6	Abst. 1	No vote 4 of 31	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	3–1–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	4–1–0	0–1–2	0–1–6	0–1–0	1–1–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	14–0–0	8–0–0	28–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–0	8–1–0
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	3–0–0	3–0–0	14–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	3–0–0	10–0–0	10–0–0	3–2–0	0–4–0	0–1–16	no member voted	0–0–1
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	4–0–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	4–0–2	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–6	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	3–0–0	17–0–0	1–0–0	8–1–0	0–23–0	0–5–2	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	0–1–2	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	9–0–0	2–0–0	9–0–1	1–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	4–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	Against	Abst.
Austria	6	0
Belgium	3	0
Czechia	1	6
Denmark	1	0
Spain	4	0
France	1	16
Greece	1	0
Hungary	0	6
Italy	5	2
Latvia	1	0
Netherlands	5	0
Poland	2	0
Portugal	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Aleksandar NIKOLIC group that day: Patriots · France
Alexander BERNHUBER group that day: EPP · Austria
Alexandra MEHNERT group that day: EPP · Germany
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE group that day: EPP · Sweden
Alicia HOMS GINEL group that day: S&D · Spain
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana Miguel PEDRO group that day: EPP · Portugal
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
André ROUGÉ group that day: Patriots · France
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Annamária VICSEK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT group that day: Patriots · France
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Assita KANKO group that day: ECR · Belgium
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Charles GOERENS group that day: Renew · Luxembourg
Christophe GRUDLER group that day: Renew · France
Cristina MAESTRE group that day: S&D · Spain
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan NICA group that day: S&D · Romania
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Dóra DÁVID group that day: EPP · Hungary
Elena DONAZZAN group that day: ECR · Italy
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma RAFOWICZ group that day: S&D · France
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Eszter LAKOS group that day: EPP · Hungary
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
France JAMET group that day: Patriots · France
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Grégory ALLIONE group that day: Renew · France
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Heléne FRITZON group that day: S&D · Sweden
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Ignazio Roberto MARINO group that day: Greens · Italy
Ilia LAZAROV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Jacek OZDOBA group that day: ECR · Poland
Jacek PROTAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Jana TOOM group that day: Renew · Estonia
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jordan BARDELLA group that day: Patriots · France
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
José CEPEDA group that day: S&D · Spain
Julie RECHAGNEUX group that day: Patriots · France
Julien SANCHEZ group that day: Patriots · France
Kinga GÁL group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Kinga KOLLÁR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Lina GÁLVEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Loucas FOURLAS group that day: EPP · Cyprus
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Lucia ANNUNZIATA group that day: S&D · Italy
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc JONGEN group that day: ESN · Germany
Marco TARQUINIO group that day: S&D · Italy
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marie DAUCHY group that day: Patriots · France
Mélanie DISDIER group that day: Patriots · France
Mélissa CAMARA group that day: Greens · France
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES group that day: S&D · Spain
Nikolas FARANTOURIS group that day: The Left · Greece
Nora MEBAREK group that day: S&D · France
Ondřej DOSTÁL group that day: No group · Czechia
Pál SZEKERES group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Pierre JOUVET group that day: S&D · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Rody TOLASSY group that day: Patriots · France
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Sebastian KRUIS group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Sergey LAGODINSKY group that day: Greens · Germany
Séverine WERBROUCK group that day: Patriots · France
Stefan BERGER group that day: EPP · Germany
Ştefan MUŞOIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA group that day: ECR · Croatia
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Taner KABILOV group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Thierry MARIANI group that day: Patriots · France
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU group that day: Renew · Romania
Vladimir PREBILIČ group that day: Greens · Slovenia
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.92 516 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	391 for, 116 against, 54 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.92 510 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted	For 73 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.91 501 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Feb 2026	Recital M — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained Adopted	For 74 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.91 495 voters
20 Jan 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises	Final	444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted	For 68 %		r · shared0.91 583 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted	For 76 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.91 509 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 4 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Split vote	410 for, 119 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.91 525 voters
28 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Final	447 for, 160 against, 43 abstained Adopted	For 69 %		r · shared0.90 576 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	417 for, 138 against, 10 abstained Adopted	For 74 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.90 512 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.90 513 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Resolution · report by Irena Joveva, Mirosława Nykiel 11 Mar 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors — Paragraph 10 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 11 Mar 2026 11 Mar 2026
Vote Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors — Separate vote on paragraph 29 Roll-call vote · 11 Mar 2026 11 Mar 2026
Vote Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors — Separate vote on paragraph 30 Roll-call vote · 11 Mar 2026 11 Mar 2026
Vote Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors — Separate vote on paragraph 53 Roll-call vote · 11 Mar 2026 11 Mar 2026
Vote Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 11 Mar 2026 11 Mar 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188830
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 10 — part 1 — Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188830, reference 2025/2038(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188830 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188830,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 1 — Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188830}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188830},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188830, reference 2025/2038(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}