Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2
Result
404 for · 139 against · 10 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 51 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ab/2
Vote id
184849
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘point out the importance of promoting women’s empowerment through inclusive, equitable and quality education, training and life-long learning, which are of vital importance for fighting gender stereotypes, attitudes and prejudices in all their dimensions and combating persisting inequalities; recall the importance of preventing gender-based violence through adequate campaigns and other actions, including by increasing digital media literacy, as well as through relevant, targeted education on age-appropriate, comprehensive relationships and sexuality, in order to increase knowledge about bodily integrity; highlight the need for a deeper understanding of anti-rights and anti-gender movements, including disinformation on gender equality, the incel phenomenon and misogyny and, in particular, their online manifestation known as the manosphere; advocate for more active policies to counter these phenomena and their narratives;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 127Against 4Abst. 6No vote 50 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 1Against 57Abst. 3No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 22Against 45Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 8Abst. 1No vote 9 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland200
France600
Ireland300
Italy800
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 553 members

No vote recorded, 166

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 166 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 489 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 484 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSplit vote449 for, 139 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesFinal444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.90 518 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 55 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 482 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 18 — part 2 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionSplit vote474 for, 145 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 512 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSplit vote463 for, 151 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 506 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote451 for, 145 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 510 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 510 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 11 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote464 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 501 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184849, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184849 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184849,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184849}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184849},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184849, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}