Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 33

EU enlargement strategy

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 33
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
268 for · 328 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 4 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members, Renew
Official label
A10-0016/2026 – Petras Auštrevičius – § 33
Text
Report A-10-2026-0016
Dossier
2025/2110(INI)
Vote id
188631
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 268 for, 328 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 25Abst. 11No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 97Against 12Abst. 12No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
RenewFor 62Against 6Abst. 1No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 56Against 99Abst. 6No vote 23 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ECRFor 1Against 73Abst. 3No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 26Abst. 0No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark400
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland210
France1000
Ireland411
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands340
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

No vote recorded, 89

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 89 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on citation 11 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote320 for, 280 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 569 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote320 for, 291 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 562 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 9 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote315 for, 291 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital K Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote329 for, 277 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 569 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 2 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote334 for, 278 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 568 voters
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsFinal310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 48 %r · shared0.79 558 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on citation 10 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote340 for, 269 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 565 voters
22 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 12 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSeparate vote334 for, 286 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.77 561 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 3 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote321 for, 270 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.77 556 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 23 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment229 for, 400 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 567 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188631
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 33 — EU enlargement strategy”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188631, reference 2025/2110(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188631 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188631,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 33 — EU enlargement strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188631}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188631},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188631, reference 2025/2110(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}