Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 3

Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 3
Result
321 for · 270 against · 47 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 15:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/3
Vote id
180157
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 321 for, 270 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “underlines the importance of addressing the difficulties caused by unanimity in the Council, including the use of unanimity for intermediate steps in the enlargement process, which could slow down the EU accession of new members owing to bilateral issues;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 20Abst. 13No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 100Against 11Abst. 5No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
RenewFor 64Against 6Abst. 1No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 94Against 48Abst. 26No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ECRFor 3Against 62Abst. 0No vote 14 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 80Abst. 0No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium011
Cyprus010
Germany121
Denmark100
Spain030
Finland300
France270
Greece130
Ireland020
Italy008
Portugal011
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 84 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineSeparate vote335 for, 272 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 563 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 66 — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Split vote367 for, 256 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.83 578 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital K Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote329 for, 277 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote320 for, 291 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 583 voters
17 Jun 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaSplit vote345 for, 295 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 578 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 80 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote347 for, 289 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.82 579 voters
11 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 32 EU enlargement strategySeparate vote301 for, 300 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by Members, Renewr · shared0.82 554 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Final330 for, 273 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 51 %r · shared0.81 582 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 49 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote373 for, 275 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPP, Patriotsr · shared0.80 587 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote366 for, 245 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 4 — part 3 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180157, reference 2025/2041(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180157 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180157,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 3 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180157}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180157},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180157, reference 2025/2041(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}