Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 20 to paragraph 5

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Vote
Amendment 20 to paragraph 5
Result
165 for · 461 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 5 – Am 20
Vote id
188612
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 165 for, 461 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 119Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 2Against 64Abst. 3No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 2Against 162Abst. 0No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 75Against 2Abst. 0No vote 4 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 55Against 3Abst. 5No vote 21 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain130
France1800
Greece100
Hungary600
Italy700
Latvia100
Netherlands005
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 635 members

No vote recorded, 83

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 83 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 574 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 517 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 30 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment186 for, 443 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.93 582 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 503 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 108 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 433 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 577 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 539 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 96 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 578 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 101 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 575 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment157 for, 411 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 530 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment180 for, 455 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 587 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 20 to paragraph 5 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188612, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188612 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188612,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 20 to paragraph 5 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188612}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188612},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188612, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}