Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after recital Z

Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies

Vote
Amendment 1, after recital Z
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
277 for · 246 against · 90 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 10 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – After recital Z – Am 1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0018
Dossier
2025/2011(INI)
Vote id
188576
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 277 for, 246 against, 90 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 2No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 115Against 3Abst. 5No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 31Against 34Abst. 1No vote 10 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
EPPFor 26Against 123Abst. 10No vote 27 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ECRFor 7Against 59Abst. 5No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 5Against 6Abst. 53No vote 20 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 5No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
No groupFor 10Against 3Abst. 9No vote 9 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria140
Belgium030
Bulgaria110
Cyprus010
Czechia311
Germany1250
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain1160
Finland130
France013
Greece060
Croatia041
Hungary005
Ireland030
Italy090
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands060
Poland1810
Portugal070
Romania090
Sweden040
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG Public procurementAmendment250 for, 384 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 550 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment226 for, 296 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 491 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.75 546 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 552 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment180 for, 332 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 468 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment177 for, 338 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 463 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment185 for, 328 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 462 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 513 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 551 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 501 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188576
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1, after recital Z — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188576, reference 2025/2011(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188576 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188576,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after recital Z — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188576}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188576},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188576, reference 2025/2011(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}