Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 10

Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 10
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
177 for · 338 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 52 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 10 – Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0136
Dossier
2026/2602(RSP)
Vote id
185313
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 177 for, 338 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 40Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 88Against 3Abst. 7No vote 38 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 11Against 45Abst. 2No vote 17 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
EPPFor 1Against 125Abst. 0No vote 61 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 0No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 4Against 15Abst. 1No vote 12 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland200
France700
Ireland300
Italy700
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 527 members

No vote recorded, 192

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 192 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment182 for, 362 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 443 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 456 voters
16 Dec 2025Proposal to vote on amendments Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural224 for, 431 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.93 490 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 26 to paragraph 23 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment219 for, 421 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 486 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in IranAmendment193 for, 348 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 510 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 94 to paragraph 52 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment211 for, 436 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 484 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 95 to paragraph 54 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment205 for, 433 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 480 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 449 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 456 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 451 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185313
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 10 — Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 185313, reference 2026/2602(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185313 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-185313,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 10 — Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185313}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185313},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 185313, reference 2026/2602(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}