Skip to content

A decision can have many votes: amendments, split parts, the final vote.

Roll-call votes

6 votes recorded by name · decision No. 9 of 10 Mar 2026

Export
More filters

A group’s line is counted with members in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested bySelect
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesFinal528 for, 21 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 86 %Select
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital Z Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesAmendment277 for, 246 against, 90 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by The LeftSelect
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote444 for, 153 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by MembersSelect
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 17 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesAmendment217 for, 306 against, 86 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The LeftSelect
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 16 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesAmendment247 for, 334 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by The LeftSelect
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote455 for, 147 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by MembersSelect