Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 48 — part 1

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 48 — part 1
Result
506 for · 106 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 173 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/1
Vote id
187345
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 506 for, 106 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Calls on the Commission to analyse housing price dynamics, including available evidence of potentially abusive speculation, and, on the basis of this analysis, to call on the Member States for possible appropriate measures;’ without the words: ‘potentially abusive’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 10Abst. 2No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 156Against 4Abst. 1No vote 25 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 42Against 30Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 28Against 38Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 18Against 2Abst. 5No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus010
Czechia300
Germany601
France100
Greece112
Luxembourg001
Poland001
Romania100
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 621 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal478 for, 146 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.72 571 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote467 for, 126 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.70 568 voters
18 Dec 2024Paragraph 4, point 4, introductory part — part 1 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesSplit vote470 for, 128 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.70 564 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote323 for, 97 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 417 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote497 for, 138 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.69 570 voters
15 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote465 for, 134 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.69 573 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital A The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSeparate vote459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.68 509 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.68 565 voters
21 May 2026Recital S — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote344 for, 111 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.68 447 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 15 — part 1 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote484 for, 78 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.68 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 48 — part 1 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187345, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187345 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187345,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 48 — part 1 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187345}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187345},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187345, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}