Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Establishing an EU talent pool

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
156 for · 462 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:14
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 56 on the decision
Official label
A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal for rejection – Am 164= 165= 166=
Text
Report A-10-2025-0045
Dossier
2023/0404(COD)
Vote id
186903
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 156 for, 462 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 11Against 152Abst. 0No vote 23 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 43Against 29Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 58Against 0Abst. 7No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 0No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia300
Germany520
France100
Greece110
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 92

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 92 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 60 to paragraph 4 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment173 for, 474 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 568 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 1, point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment148 for, 475 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 572 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 1 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment169 for, 429 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 559 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Amendment 4 to recital BA Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment178 for, 445 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.91 568 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment185 for, 439 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.91 583 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAmendment155 for, 465 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 558 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 62 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment158 for, 448 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 554 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Amendment182 for, 466 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 592 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment170 for, 462 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.90 582 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 66 to paragraph 63 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment164 for, 466 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186903
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Establishing an EU talent pool”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 186903, reference 2023/0404(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186903 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-186903,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Establishing an EU talent pool}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186903}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186903},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186903, reference 2023/0404(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}