Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 31, after recital C

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 31, after recital C
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
193 for · 464 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After recital C – Am 31
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183499
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 5Against 171Abst. 3No vote 9 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 14Abst. 0No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0310
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0200
Finland040
France213
Greece070
Croatia150
Hungary070
Ireland040
Italy090
Lithuania020
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands060
Poland0220
Portugal060
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia130
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 590 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 598 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 56 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment184 for, 448 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment189 for, 471 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.97 613 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 606 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 393 to recital 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment183 for, 445 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Patriots, EPPr · shared0.97 594 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 608 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment171 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 356 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.97 598 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183499
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 31, after recital C — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183499, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183499 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183499,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 31, after recital C — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183499}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183499},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183499, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}