Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 16 — part 2

Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work

Vote
Paragraph 16 — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 17 Dec 2025
Result
471 for · 137 against · 49 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 December 2025, 12:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0244/2025 – Andrzej Buła – § 16/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0244
Dossier
2025/2080(INL)
Vote id
182780
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 126Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 59Against 9Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
EPPFor 162Against 10Abst. 1No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 16Against 16Abst. 43No vote 4 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 20Against 2Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia010
Germany0150
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.85 615 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point h — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 120 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 531 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsSplit vote473 for, 121 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 607 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 545 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.84 585 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 48 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment421 for, 74 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.83 542 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.83 615 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 1 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote442 for, 134 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 565 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote403 for, 168 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 537 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 546 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182780
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 16 — part 2 — Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work”. Vote, 17 December 2025. votingId 182780, reference 2025/2080(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182780 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-17-182780,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 16 — part 2 — Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182780}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182780},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182780, reference 2025/2080(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}