Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital BE — part 3

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Vote
Recital BE — part 3
Result
411 for · 207 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 33 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, S&D · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/3
Dossier
2018/0902R
Vote id
181694
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 411 for, 207 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “such as a ban on legal gender recognition on a constitutional footing and removing gender identity from the explicit list of protected characteristics under the Equal Treatment Act”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 140Against 22Abst. 2No vote 24 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 0Against 70Abst. 3No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 14Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia090
Denmark010
Spain060
France0280
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland010
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportFinal387 for, 191 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.94 556 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote389 for, 153 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 508 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaSplit vote436 for, 208 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 610 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 524 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 20 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote431 for, 184 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 580 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 544 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote419 for, 172 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 547 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote452 for, 194 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 591 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.93 503 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.92 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital BE — part 3 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181694, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181694 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181694,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital BE — part 3 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181694}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181694},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181694, reference 2018/0902R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}