Skip to content

Dossier · Non-legislative procedure

Proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Reference
2018/0902(NLE) Non-legislative procedure
Where it stands
No recorded steps yet.
Lead committee
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE
More facts (6)
Rapporteurs
Tineke STRIK, MEP #197531
Shadow rapporteurs
14 members
Decisions in plenary
None yet
Versions
1 version
Opinions from
AFCO
Listed as
2018/0902R in the vote records

Where it stands

The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.

  1. Referred to committee (to come)
  2. Committee work (to come)
  3. Tabled for plenary (to come)
  4. Plenary vote (to come)
  5. Adopted by the Council (to come)

A decision the Council takes on its own. Depending on the Treaty article, Parliament either gives its consent — accepting or rejecting the text without amending it — or is consulted and gives an opinion.

People

Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.

Lead committee
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE
Rapporteurs
Tineke STRIK (Greens), MEP #197531 (Greens) former member
Shadow rapporteurs
MEP #124992 (The Left) former member, Jean-Paul GARRAUD (ID), MEP #197597 (ID) former member, Isabel WISELER-LIMA (EPP), Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ (EPP), MEP #197678 (S&D) former member, Krzysztof ŚMISZEK (S&D), András LÁSZLÓ (Patriots), Georgiana TEODORESCU (ECR), Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA (ECR), Sophie WILMÈS (Renew), MEP #134605 (Renew) former member, Konstantinos ARVANITIS (The Left), Milan UHRÍK (ESN)
Opinion: AFCO
Constitutional Affairs · rapporteur MEP #197507 (S&D) former member

Decisions in plenary, 0

Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.

No plenary decision on this dossier is in the records yet.

Voting grid

Export

Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.

Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).

  1. Adopted 419–180–30

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  2. Adopted 416–202–12

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  3. Adopted 421–178–33

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  4. Adopted 408–209–11

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  5. Adopted 411–207–14

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  6. Adopted 422–180–32

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  7. Adopted 418–158–55

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Divided
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  8. Adopted 420–188–24

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  9. Adopted 417–199–14

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  10. Adopted 418–160–51

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Divided
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  11. Adopted 413–189–32

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  12. Adopted 410–190–29

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  13. Adopted 418–190–26

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  14. Adopted 429–188–21

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  15. Adopted 415–193–28

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against

Show all 41 votes (the final votes and the latest other votes are shown: 15)

Add members’ columns
The people on this dossier — pick up to 6. Each gets a column with their own position.

Versions, 1

The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.

  1. Adopted by Parliament12 Sept 2018

    Adopted text TA8-0340/2018 TA-8-2018-0340

AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
  • Adopted text TA8-0340/2018: Parliament adopted a resolution calling on the Council to determine, under Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded.

Report a problem

What changed

Between consecutive versions of the text, newest pair first.

No overview of what changed between versions is available for this dossier — fewer than two versions of its text are linked in the open data.

Timeline, 0

Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.

No recorded steps yet.

Connections

Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.

Texts voted on

Dossiers sharing a running issue

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Dossier, 25 November 2025. procId 2018-0902R, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2018-0902R (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2018-0902R (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2018-0902r,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2018-0902R}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2018-0902R},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Dossier. procId 2018-0902R, reference 2018/0902R. Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}