Skip to content

Member

Marit MAIJ

S&D · Netherlands

Group
S&D
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
99.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
92.7 %ⓘ of 617 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PRO Progressief Nederland
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
41 of 610 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, DEVE (substitute), EMPL
Member id
91636
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.5 %

617 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+10.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.7 %

572 of 617 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−4.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.7 %

41 of 610 votes where their group had a clear line

19 opposite (for ↔ against), 21 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

24 of 617 votes cast

Participation 99.5 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marit MAIJ99.5 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 92.7 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marit MAIJ92.7 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 263 for, 108 against, 222 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2 192 for, 374 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Separate vote on paragraph 2 266 for, 304 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Final votePassed 436 for, 149 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 May 2025Euratom Research and Training Programme for the period 2026-2027 complementing Horizon Europe Final votePassed 489 for, 55 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 6 to Article 1, point 2 Règlement (UE) nº 575/2013 Article 510, paragraph paragraph 7 et 8 259 for, 288 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 1 115 for, 442 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Final votePassed 374 for, 176 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 177 for, 400 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 181 for, 396 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 3 180 for, 367 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Final votePassed 411 for, 100 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 3, adding text after recital 11 164 for, 358 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 4, adding text after recital 10 217 for, 348 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 176 for, 380 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 5, adding text after recital 5 185 for, 362 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 6 to Article 2, après le paragraph 2 172 for, 376 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Final votePassed 564 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 9, adding text after recital 29 171 for, 414 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 172 for, 405 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 14, adding text after recital 27 111 for, 428 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 13, adding text after recital 27 114 for, 424 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 30, adding text after recital 1 195 for, 387 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 29, adding text after recital 1 189 for, 388 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 19, adding text after recital 1 164 for, 407 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 171 for, 407 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 17, adding text after recital 1 169 for, 415 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 27 to Annex II, point 1 Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex VII, point 1 176 for, 411 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 12 to Annex I, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex IV, point 4.1, fourth sentence 163 for, 418 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 31 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 187 for, 387 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 26 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 151 for, 421 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 25 to Article 1, alinéa 1, après le point 24 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 après l'article 32 158 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 15 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 23 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 30, paragraph 2 103 for, 438 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendments 7 + 11 (voted as one) to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 21, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 26, après le paragraph 1 105 for, 462 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 10 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 16, sous-point b Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 22, paragraph 2, point b 159 for, 411 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Request by The Left Group 102 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Request by the PfE Group 132 for, 334 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 306 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 6, adding text after recital E 172 for, 288 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 146 for, 311 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 164 for, 276 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 2 375 for, 92 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 1 444 for, 32 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 100 for, 306 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 86 for, 345 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 168 for, 312 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 281 for, 193 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 67 for, 378 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 137 for, 326 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 127 for, 321 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands99 % of 5 748 shared93 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands99 % of 5 389 shared93 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands97 % of 5 174 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany96 % of 5 005 shared93 %
Gabriele BISCHOFF S&DGermany96 % of 5 682 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany96 % of 4 235 shared93 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany95 % of 4 643 shared93 %
Bruno TOBBACK S&DBelgium95 % of 5 615 shared93 %
René REPASI S&DGermany95 % of 5 539 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain95 % of 5 440 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands89 % of 5 459 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands89 % of 5 455 shared83 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia89 % of 5 539 shared86 %
Tineke STRIK GreensNetherlands88 % of 5 539 shared83 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium88 % of 4 205 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 823 shared86 %
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany88 % of 5 463 shared49 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia88 % of 5 847 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 891 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia88 % of 5 369 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember9 Oct 2024now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the Cariforum-EU Parliamentary CommitteeDCAR Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL14 Sept 2026
EU Gender Action Plan IV – priorities for gender equality and women’s rights in external actionShadow rapporteurDEVE8 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - AgenciesShadow rapporteurCONT20 Aug 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurEMPL18 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegation · 2 declarationsDEVE18 May 2026
Africa - EU Interparliamentary Assembly in EswatiniOfficial delegationDAFR5 May 2026
FIRST ORDINARY PLENARY AFRICA-EU PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLYOfficial delegationDAFR29 Mar 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1252Opinion rapporteurDEVE3 Mar 2026
Amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the otherShadow rapporteurDEVE2 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL21 Jan 2026

Show all 35 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

75 contributions recorded; 13 on behalf of their group; 97 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 39

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026EU response to United Arab Emirates’ support to the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan E-10-2026-003026Written questionwith 3 co-authors18 Aug 2026
8 Jul 2026European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822Written questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0359Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
30 Jun 2026Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698Written questionwith 43 co-authors18 Sept 2026
18 Jun 2026Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532Written questionwith 27 co-authors6 Aug 2026
12 Mar 2026Situation in Sudan E-10-2026-001036Written questionwith 13 co-authors30 Apr 2026
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0166Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
27 Jan 2026Important and special situation of the overseas countries and territories, including Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao E-10-2026-000313Written questionwith 1 co-author26 Mar 2026

Show all 39 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 78

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 78 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marit MAIJ”. Member record. memberId 91636. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/91636?page=87&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/91636. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/91636?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-91636,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marit MAIJ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/91636?page=87&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/91636?page=87&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 91636. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/91636. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}