Member

Julien SANCHEZ

Patriots · France

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 91.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 94.4 %ⓘ of 567 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 80.0 %

More facts (5)

National party: RN Rassemblement national
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 3 of 452 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG, CONT
Member id: 88552

National party: RN Rassemblement national
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 3 of 452 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG, CONT
Member id: 88552

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.6 %

568 of 620 final votes while in office

Patriots median: 90.8 % (+0.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.4 %

535 of 567 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 80.0 % (+14.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

3 of 452 votes where their group had a clear line

0 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

12.9 %

73 of 568 votes cast

Participation 91.6 % — Patriots median 90.8 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Julien SANCHEZ	91.6 %
Patriots median	90.8 %
Lowest in the group	44.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	89

With majority line 94.4 % — Patriots median 80.0 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Julien SANCHEZ	94.4 %
Patriots median	80.0 %
Lowest in the group	59.5 %
Highest in the group	94.8 %
Members	89

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 5 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	0
21 Jan 2025	1	0
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	5
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	5
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	3
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	0
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	0
8 Jul 2026	15	0
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Julien LEONARDELLI	Julien LEONARDELLI	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 214 shared	74 %
Select Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 589 shared	74 %
Select Fabrice LEGGERI	Fabrice LEGGERI	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 234 shared	74 %
Select Jean-Paul GARRAUD	Jean-Paul GARRAUD	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 188 shared	74 %
Select Marie DAUCHY	Marie DAUCHY	Patriots	France	100 % of 4 394 shared	74 %
Select Julie RECHAGNEUX	Julie RECHAGNEUX	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 290 shared	74 %
Select Catherine GRISET	Catherine GRISET	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 336 shared	74 %
Select Séverine WERBROUCK	Séverine WERBROUCK	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 088 shared	74 %
Select Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT	Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 008 shared	74 %
Select Valérie DELOGE	Valérie DELOGE	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 444 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	ESN	France	78 % of 4 186 shared	70 %
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	77 % of 4 793 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	76 % of 5 353 shared	68 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	76 % of 5 089 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	76 % of 4 935 shared	68 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	73 % of 4 581 shared	51 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 299 shared	68 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	70 % of 5 104 shared	70 %
Select Hans NEUHOFF	Hans NEUHOFF	ESN	Germany	70 % of 4 122 shared	70 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	70 % of 5 018 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working group	Member	20 Feb 2025	now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	CONT	17 Jul 2026
92e réunion interparlementaire UE-Etats-Unis du Dialogue transatlantique des législateurs, 25-26 août 2026, San Francisco, Etats-Unis.	Official delegation	D-US	13 Jul 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	2 Jun 2026
Research and training programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2028-2032, complementing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and providing for the Community’s contribution to the ITER project	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	5 May 2026
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	30 Apr 2026
Research and training programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2028-2032, complementing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and providing for the Community’s contribution to the ITER project	Opinion rapporteur	BUDG	9 Apr 2026
Amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	1 Apr 2026
Establishing the Union support for the Schengen area, for European integrated border management and for the common policy on visas for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	10 Mar 2026
Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	10 Mar 2026
Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/444, (EU) 2021/690, (EU) 2021/785, (EU) 2021/847 and (EU) 2021/1077	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	15 Feb 2026

Show all 34 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

55 contributions recorded; 9 on behalf of their group; 83 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
12 Mar 2026	Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 32

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
1 Jul 2026	Agricultural land grabbing in the EU and the appropriation of CAP funds by foreign interests E-10-2026-002740	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	18 Aug 2026
22 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the urgent need for access to drinking water and sanitation in the outermost regions B-10-2026-0188	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
14 Apr 2026	Genetically modified organisms: prohibited from production, but authorised for import E-10-2026-001511	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	22 Jun 2026
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061	Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors	—
14 Jan 2026	MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063	Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors	—
25 Nov 2025	Plan to set up a European intelligence service under the authority of the President of the Commission E-10-2025-004681	Written questionwith 49 co-authors	Not yet answered
31 Oct 2025	Returns to Afghanistan: response to Member States’ call for an effective migration policy O-10-2025-000039	Oral questionwith 44 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Oct 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447	Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors	—
1 Oct 2025	UN Special Rapporteur’s report recommending a global ban on all forms of surrogacy P-10-2025-003805	Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors	24 Oct 2025
12 Sept 2025	MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400	Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors	—
10 Sept 2025	Commission steamrolling ahead with Mercosur agreement O-10-2025-000027	Oral questionwith 41 co-authors	Not yet answered
12 Jun 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on combating the establishment of transnational Islamist networks in Europe B-10-2025-0279	Motion for a resolutionwith 60 co-authors	—
16 May 2025	For Christmas, the Commission awarded Amazon a contract for cloud services worth half a billion euros E-10-2025-001982	Written questionwith 1 co-author	18 Jul 2025
5 May 2025	Combating the misuse of national symbols on food packaging E-10-2025-001805	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	2 Jul 2025
1 Apr 2025	Reciprocity of health and environmental standards on the EU horticulture market E-10-2025-001338	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	14 Jul 2025
18 Mar 2025	Condemnation of the Commission’s biased report on combating anti-Muslim hatred E-10-2025-001138	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	18 Jun 2025
20 Feb 2025	Measures taken by the European Ports Alliance since its establishment last year E-10-2025-000801	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	18 Jul 2025
19 Feb 2025	Commission control of Recovery and Resilience Facility funds E-10-2025-000746	Written question	9 Jul 2025
19 Feb 2025	Is EU funding under the Recovery and Resilience Facility deliberately opaque? E-10-2025-000747	Written question	2 May 2025
30 Jan 2025	Legitimacy of the European Democracy Shield E-10-2025-000447	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	31 Mar 2025
27 Jan 2025	Former Commissioner Thierry Breton’s new lobbying activities for Bank of America E-10-2025-000358	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	3 Apr 2025
18 Dec 2024	Request for financial transparency and a simulation incorporating off-budget appropriations into the 2025 EU budget E-10-2024-003011	Written question	8 Apr 2025
5 Dec 2024	Upcoming conclusion of the Mercosur agreement: stabbing French farmers in the back E-10-2024-002777	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	21 Mar 2025
18 Oct 2024	EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa, a EUR 5 billion sinkhole E-10-2024-002169	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	6 Jan 2025
18 Oct 2024	Spanish Government measures’ compatibility with press freedom defended by the EU E-10-2024-002172	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	30 Nov 2024
10 Oct 2024	Sharp increase in illegal fishing in French Guiana E-10-2024-002012	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	20 Dec 2024
10 Oct 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119	Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors	—
27 Sept 2024	Detrimental impact of Bosman ruling and Cotonou Agreement on European football E-10-2024-001859	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	20 Nov 2024
23 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the surge in the number of sub-Saharan migrants B-10-2024-0065	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
19 Sept 2024	Follow-up to the Draghi report E-10-2024-001767	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	10 Jan 2025
10 Sept 2024	Attacks on Bangladesh’s Hindu minority E-10-2024-001670	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	21 Oct 2024
9 Sept 2024	Pro-Hamas NGO funded by the EU P-10-2024-001656	Priority written questionwith 16 co-authors	28 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 110

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
17 Sept 2026	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Spain – EGF/2026/002 ES/Galicia automotive ancillary BUDG-AM-792050	BUDG	2
16 Sept 2026	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Finland – EGF/2026/003 FI/Valmet Automotive BUDG-AM-792051	BUDG	2
15 Sept 2026	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2026/001 BE/Cora BUDG-AM-792086	BUDG	2
10 Sept 2026	Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council CONT-AM-792137	CONT	2
1 Jul 2026	Draft amending budget no 2 to the general budget 2026 - update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure BUDG-AM-790749	BUDG	13
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790102	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790158	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790157	CJ71	1

Show all 110 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/88552?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Julien SANCHEZ”. Member record. memberId 88552. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/88552?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/88552. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/88552?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-88552,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Julien SANCHEZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/88552?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/88552?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 88552. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/88552. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 32

Amendments tabled in committee, 110

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928