Member
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ
Greens · Romania
- Group
- Greens Verts/ALE
- Country
- Romania
- Roll-call participation
- 62.2 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
- With majority line
- 97.5 %ⓘ of 3 689 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
- National party
- Independent
- In office
- Since 16 Jul 2024
- Against clear line
- 66 of 3 602 votesⓘ
- Committees
- AGRI (substitute), BUDG, ITRE, SANT (substitute)
- Member id
- 58766
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
62.2 %
3 690 of 5 928 roll calls while in office
Greens median: 92.2 % (−29.9 pts)
Chamber median: 90.2 %
With majority line ⓘ
97.5 %
3 597 of 3 689 votes where their group had a line
Greens median: 97.1 % (+0.4 pts)
42 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line, 18 voted for or against when the line was to abstain
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ | 62.2 % |
| Greens median | 92.2 % |
| Lowest in the group | 48.0 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.6 % |
| Members | 54 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ | 97.5 % |
| Greens median | 97.1 % |
| Lowest in the group | 87.9 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.4 % |
| Members | 54 |
- Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R | 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N | 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N | 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L | 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital H | 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 | 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 | 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 | 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 | 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 | 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 | 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 | 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 | 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 | 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 | 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 | 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 | 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 | 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 | 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 | 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 | 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 | 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 | 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 | 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 | 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 | 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 | 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 | 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 | 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 | 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 | 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 | 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 | 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 | 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 | 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 | 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 | 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 | 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 | 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 | 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 | 228 for, 413 against, 9 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 | 261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 13 — part 2 | 475 for, 149 against, 21 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 | 92 for, 521 against, 29 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 8 — part 2 | 457 for, 178 against, 9 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 | 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 | 319 for, 295 against, 36 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 2 | 497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 1 | 603 for, 29 against, 18 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 | 183 for, 416 against, 47 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Seats
| Body | Role | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee | Substitute | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee | Member | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee | Member | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee | Substitute | 23 Jan 2025 | now |
| Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD Delegation | Substitute | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation | Substitute | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly | Member | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group | Member | 11 Mar 2025 | now |
| Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group | Member | 2 Jun 2026 | now |
| Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group | Member | 31 Jan 2025 | now |
Dossiers
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Foreign affairs 96
- EU budget & funds 36
- Jobs, social affairs & equality 34
- Defence & security 20
- Economy & single market 20
- Justice, rule of law & rights 19
- Digital, AI & data 12
- Climate & environment 11
- Health 7
- Agriculture, food & fisheries 6
- EU institutions & Parliament 6
- Transport & tourism 4
- Migration & asylum 3
- Trade & customs 3
- Energy 2
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
243 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 144 minutes of speaking time.
| Date | Debate | Kind | Verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Adjournment of the session | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Dates of the next part-session | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Approval of the minutes of the sitting and forwarding of texts adopted | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (B10-0406/2026) | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (B10-0406/2026) | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (B10-0390/2026) | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (B10-0386/2026) | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (A10-0168/2026 - Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza) | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Oral explanations of votes (Rule 201) | Speech | Read |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Protecting people’s health against toxic substances (debate) | Speech | Read |
Questions and motions, 108
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
Amendments tabled in committee, 37
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political group
- Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism
National delegation
- Delegation Romania National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 1 October 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ”. Member record. memberId 58766. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/58766?docs=all&page=76&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/58766. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/58766?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-58766,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/58766?docs=all&page=76&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/58766?docs=all&page=76&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-10-01},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 58766. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/58766. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}