Member

Andi CRISTEA

S&D · Romania

Group: S&D
Country: Romania
Roll-call participation: 90.9 %ⓘ of 5 503 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 95.3 %ⓘ of 5 001 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office: Since 2 Dec 2024
Against clear line: 205 of 4 922 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, ITRE (substitute), PETI (substitute), REGI
Member id: 40224

National party: PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office: Since 2 Dec 2024
Against clear line: 205 of 4 922 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, ITRE (substitute), PETI (substitute), REGI
Member id: 40224

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

90.9 %

5 003 of 5 503 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (+1.1 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.3 %

4 767 of 5 001 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (−0.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.2 %

205 of 4 922 votes where their group had a clear line

108 opposite (for ↔ against), 95 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.6 %

180 of 5 003 votes cast

Participation 90.9 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Andi CRISTEA	90.9 %
S&D median	89.9 %
Lowest in the group	30.4 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	138

With majority line 95.3 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Andi CRISTEA	95.3 %
S&D median	96.3 %
Lowest in the group	81.9 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	138

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 503

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 88 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	32
19 Dec 2024	45	42
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	222
13 Mar 2025	24	23
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	233
3 Apr 2025	62	59
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	214
8 May 2025	103	99
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	36
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	86
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	125
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	76
10 Sept 2025	34	30
11 Sept 2025	69	52
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	61
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	184
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	211
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	62
26 Nov 2025	100	97
27 Nov 2025	125	118
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	40
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	66
21 Jan 2026	112	107
22 Jan 2026	58	57
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	37
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	135
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	197	197
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	31
25 Mar 2026	3	0
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	0
28 Apr 2026	225	223
29 Apr 2026	296	139
30 Apr 2026	68	64
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	83
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	118
18 Jun 2026	77	74
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	71
8 Jul 2026	144	143
9 Jul 2026	67	58
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	151
16 Sept 2026	80	66
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	S&D	Romania	98 % of 3 151 shared	93 %
Select Victor NEGRESCU	Victor NEGRESCU	S&D	Romania	97 % of 4 210 shared	93 %
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	S&D	Romania	97 % of 2 481 shared	93 %
Select Ştefan MUŞOIU	Ştefan MUŞOIU	S&D	Romania	97 % of 4 101 shared	93 %
Select Gheorghe CÂRCIU	Gheorghe CÂRCIU	S&D	Romania	97 % of 3 133 shared	93 %
Select Mihai TUDOSE	Mihai TUDOSE	S&D	Romania	97 % of 3 260 shared	93 %
Select Gabriela FIREA	Gabriela FIREA	S&D	Romania	97 % of 3 364 shared	93 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	96 % of 3 170 shared	93 %
Select Vasile DÎNCU	Vasile DÎNCU	S&D	Romania	96 % of 4 580 shared	93 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	95 % of 4 572 shared	93 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	90 % of 1 562 shared	86 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	89 % of 4 663 shared	86 %
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Renew	Luxembourg	89 % of 4 644 shared	86 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	89 % of 4 442 shared	86 %
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	Renew	France	89 % of 4 385 shared	86 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 3 625 shared	86 %
Select Valérie HAYER	Valérie HAYER	Renew	France	88 % of 4 799 shared	86 %
Select Valérie DEVAUX	Valérie DEVAUX	Renew	France	88 % of 4 578 shared	86 %
Select Jérémy DECERLE	Jérémy DECERLE	Renew	France	88 % of 2 694 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	88 % of 4 461 shared	86 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	20 Mar 2025	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Substitute	18 Dec 2024	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	18 Dec 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-ME Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	18 Dec 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Member	18 Dec 2024	now
Intergroup on DemographyIG10-09 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working group	Member	10 Nov 2025	now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Feb 2025	now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Substitute	18 Dec 2024	19 Mar 2025

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	21 Jan 2026
Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	INTA	8 Apr 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

18 contributions recorded; 22 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
18 Jun 2026	International Day of Play: promoting children’s right to play (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Feb 2026	Time to address economic inequalities in the EU and worldwide (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Presentation of the Digital Networks Act (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Phasing out Russian natural gas imports and improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Nov 2025	Development of an industry for sustainable aviation and maritime fuel in Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Jul 2025	European Citizens' Initiative 'Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures' (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 May 2025	A unified EU response to unjustified US trade measures and global trade opportunities for the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
5 May 2025	Preparation of the EU-UK summit (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
31 Mar 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
31 Mar 2025	Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals (short presentation)	Speech · 1 min	Read
31 Mar 2025	Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency (short presentation)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2025	Establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of Moldova (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2025	Powering Europe’s future - advancing the fusion industry for energy independence and innovation (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Questions and motions, 21

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
8 Sept 2026	Autonomous AI-enabled cyberattacks and the protection of European critical infrastructure E-10-2026-003554	Written question	Not yet answered
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0309	Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors	—
26 Mar 2026	Safeguard activation thresholds for highly sensitive products under the GSP revision E-10-2026-001286	Written question	13 May 2026
17 Mar 2026	Supporting the development of leading companies in central and eastern Europe E-10-2026-001089	Written question	19 May 2026
11 Mar 2026	Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014	Oral questionwith 42 co-authors	Not yet answered
3 Mar 2026	Implications of the European Industrial Accelerator Act for the EU-UK strategic economic partnership E-10-2026-000867	Written question	21 May 2026
15 Dec 2025	Application of newly adopted safeguard measures on imports of ferro-alloying elements to the Everything But Arms beneficiary countries E-10-2025-004954	Written question	12 Feb 2026
12 Nov 2025	Trade measures on steel products and their economic implications for the downstream industries and broader supply chain E-10-2025-004503	Written question	19 Jan 2026
21 Oct 2025	EU stance on space E-10-2025-004130	Written question	8 Jan 2026
21 Oct 2025	High airfares and possible cartel practices in the aviation sector E-10-2025-004142	Written questionwith 16 co-authors	27 Jan 2026

Show all 21 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 17

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790093	CJ71	1
22 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790089	CJ71	1
28 Apr 2026	Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities REGI-AM-787822	REGI	6
24 Apr 2026	Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities REGI-AM-787744	REGI	18
24 Apr 2026	Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities REGI-AM-787745	REGI	7
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786888	ITRE	1
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786883	ITRE	2
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786884	ITRE	5
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786887	ITRE	2
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786889	ITRE	5

Show all 17 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/40224?nb=all&speeches=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Andi CRISTEA”. Member record. memberId 40224. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/40224?nb=all&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/40224. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/40224?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-40224,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Andi CRISTEA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/40224?nb=all&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/40224?nb=all&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 40224. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/40224. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 503

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 21

Amendments tabled in committee, 17

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 503