Skip to content

Member

Vasile DÎNCU

S&D · Romania

Group
S&D
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
84.1 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line
96.3 %ⓘ of 2 429 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.5 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
79 of 2 405 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO, AFET (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
33998
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

84.1 %

2 431 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.0 % (−5.9 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.3 %

2 340 of 2 429 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.5 % (−0.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.3 %

79 of 2 405 votes where their group had a clear line

57 opposite (for ↔ against), 19 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.6 %

64 of 2 431 votes cast

Participation 84.1 % — S&D median 90.0 %, 136 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Vasile DÎNCU84.1 %
S&D median90.0 %
Lowest in the group54.5 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members136
With majority line 96.3 % — S&D median 96.5 %, 136 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Vasile DÎNCU96.3 %
S&D median96.5 %
Lowest in the group80.8 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members136
  • 2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 19 — part 2 518 for, 87 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 17 — part 2 440 for, 156 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 7 486 for, 119 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 6 431 for, 132 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 5 553 for, 34 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 4 424 for, 157 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 3 526 for, 79 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 2 466 for, 133 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 1 577 for, 44 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 27 to paragraph 16 131 for, 483 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 26 to paragraph 15 123 for, 486 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 69 to paragraph 14 119 for, 483 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 13 127 for, 482 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 13 127 for, 486 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 13 — part 4 462 for, 101 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 13 — part 3 540 for, 69 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 13 — part 2 443 for, 87 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 12 437 for, 156 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 7 439 for, 160 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 6 516 for, 40 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 5 545 for, 29 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 4 477 for, 120 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 3 451 for, 147 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 2 329 for, 260 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 1 565 for, 39 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 10 97 for, 494 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 99, adding text after paragraph 4 193 for, 419 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 98, adding text after paragraph 4 155 for, 431 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 4 173 for, 423 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 4 177 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 92 for, 491 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 4 — part 2 516 for, 79 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 3 128 for, 471 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 3 127 for, 476 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 3 122 for, 484 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 3 133 for, 476 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 3 — part 1 468 for, 123 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1 128 for, 482 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 24, adding text before paragraph 1 140 for, 478 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 493 for, 92 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 441 for, 105 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Establishing an EU talent pool Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 414 for, 182 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Establishing an EU talent pool Proposal to vote on amendments 160 for, 462 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Establishing an EU talent pool Proposal to reject the text 156 for, 462 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 498 for, 90 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Proposal to vote on amendments 164 for, 447 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Mar 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group 87 for, 291 against, 22 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 437 for, 82 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Amendment 20, adding text after recital F 263 for, 273 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Paragraph 23 — part 2 404 for, 131 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain97 % of 4 934 shared93 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal96 % of 4 726 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania96 % of 5 044 shared93 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal96 % of 5 221 shared93 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal96 % of 4 929 shared93 %
Camilla LAURETI S&DItaly96 % of 5 246 shared93 %
Francisco ASSIS S&DPortugal96 % of 4 329 shared93 %
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES S&DPortugal96 % of 4 541 shared93 %
Ana Catarina MENDES S&DPortugal96 % of 4 837 shared93 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania96 % of 3 501 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly91 % of 1 721 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia89 % of 4 731 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg89 % of 4 995 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance89 % of 5 108 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania89 % of 5 014 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia89 % of 4 599 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia89 % of 5 050 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands89 % of 5 294 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance89 % of 4 802 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance89 % of 4 754 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute25 Jun 2025now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeVice-chair3 Feb 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-UA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblySubstitute23 Mar 2026now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assemblyVice-chair26 Jun 2025now
Intergroup on DemographyIG10-09 Intergroup / working groupChair co27 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working groupMember30 Jan 2025now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its interaction with national authorities in the application of Union law, with particular reference to Article 19 TEUShadow rapporteurAFCO11 Jun 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence UnionShadow rapporteurSEDE25 Mar 2026
Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial managementShadow rapporteurAFCO18 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEUDS10 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionAFCO2 Feb 2026
71st Annual Session of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NATO PA) in Ljubljana (Slovenia) from 10-13 October 2025.Official delegationDNAT1 Oct 2025
No dossier namedDelegation vice-chairDNAT25 Jun 2025
Establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937Shadow rapporteur for an opinionAFCO5 May 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEUDS11 Apr 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairEUDS3 Feb 2025

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

47 contributions recorded, 20 written statements; 34 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 2026Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate) StatementRead
17 Jun 2026Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) StatementRead
20 May 2026Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap (debate) StatementRead
19 May 2026EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026The need to combat antisemitism and protect Jewish life in Europe, following the recent attacks against the Jewish community in the Netherlands and Belgium (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate) StatementRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 11

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
24 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on supporting democratic resilience in Armenia B-10-2026-0198Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
31 Mar 2026Dynamic pricing, competition concerns and consumer protection in FIFA World Cup 2026 ticket sales E-10-2026-001336Written questionwith 22 co-authors9 Jun 2026
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Nov 2025Financing for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and for undertakings in difficulty, plus the General Block Exemption Regulation E-10-2025-004554Written questionwith 7 co-authors2 Feb 2026
20 Jun 2025NGO funding through the LIFE programme E-10-2025-002493Written questionwith 33 co-authors27 Aug 2025
28 May 2025Recognition of expenses for demography as investment for budgetary balance E-10-2025-002128Written questionwith 41 co-authors5 Sept 2025
21 May 2025A joint body to coordinate the reconstruction of Ukraine? E-10-2025-002036Written question9 Jul 2025
10 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of unlawful detention and sham trial of Armenian hostages,including high-ranking political representatives from Nagorno Karabakh, by Azerbaijan B-10-2025-0184Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
5 Feb 2025Hate speech and threats against Armenia by the President of Azerbaijan E-10-2025-000527Written question22 Apr 2025

Show all 11 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 40

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 40 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Vasile DÎNCU”. Member record. memberId 33998. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/33998?page=41&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/33998. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/33998?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-33998,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Vasile DÎNCU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/33998?page=41&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/33998?page=41&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 33998. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/33998. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}