Member

Roberts ZĪLE

ECR · Latvia

Group: ECR
Country: Latvia
Roll-call participation: 73.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 87.4 %ⓘ of 451 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: TB/LNNK Nacionālā apvienība "Visu Latvijai!" - "Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK"
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 27 of 377 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG (substitute), ECON, TRAN
Member id: 28615

National party: TB/LNNK Nacionālā apvienība "Visu Latvijai!" - "Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK"
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 27 of 377 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG (substitute), ECON, TRAN
Member id: 28615

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

73.4 %

455 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (−18.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

87.4 %

394 of 451 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−0.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.2 %

27 of 377 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 12 abstained against the line, 11 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.2 %

60 of 455 votes cast

Participation 73.4 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Roberts ZĪLE	73.4 %
ECR median	91.9 %
Lowest in the group	51.0 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	79

With majority line 87.4 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Roberts ZĪLE	87.4 %
ECR median	87.7 %
Lowest in the group	46.1 %
Highest in the group	94.6 %
Members	79

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 21 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	0
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	0
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	0
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	1
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	2
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	3
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	0
22 May 2025	6	0
17 Jun 2025	8	0
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	0
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	0
10 Jul 2025	7	0
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	0
8 Oct 2025	10	0
9 Oct 2025	10	0
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	0
23 Oct 2025	5	0
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	0
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	7
10 Feb 2026	8	0
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	0
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	0
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	14
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	15
17 Sept 2026	10	9

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Rihards KOLS	Rihards KOLS	ECR	Latvia	96 % of 4 041 shared	81 %
Select Reinis POZŅAKS	Reinis POZŅAKS	ECR	Latvia	96 % of 4 136 shared	81 %
Select Ivaylo VALCHEV	Ivaylo VALCHEV	ECR	Bulgaria	90 % of 4 246 shared	81 %
Select Mario MANTOVANI	Mario MANTOVANI	ECR	Italy	87 % of 3 355 shared	81 %
Select Aurelijus VERYGA	Aurelijus VERYGA	ECR	Lithuania	87 % of 4 018 shared	81 %
Select Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	ECR	Croatia	86 % of 3 632 shared	81 %
Select Adrian-George AXINIA	Adrian-George AXINIA	ECR	Romania	86 % of 3 751 shared	81 %
Select Antonella SBERNA	Antonella SBERNA	ECR	Italy	86 % of 3 810 shared	81 %
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER changed group	ECR	Spain	86 % of 3 861 shared	81 %
Select Nora JUNCO GARCÍA	Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group	ECR	Spain	86 % of 3 675 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jaroslav KNOT	Jaroslav KNOT	Patriots	Czechia	72 % of 2 388 shared	68 %
Select Nikola BARTŮŠEK	Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group	ECR	Czechia	71 % of 3 357 shared	61 %
Select Klara DOSTALOVA	Klara DOSTALOVA	Patriots	Czechia	70 % of 3 260 shared	68 %
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	70 % of 4 137 shared	68 %
Select Ondřej KNOTEK	Ondřej KNOTEK	Patriots	Czechia	70 % of 3 877 shared	68 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	70 % of 3 577 shared	48 %
Select Branko GRIMS	Branko GRIMS changed group	No group	Slovenia	70 % of 4 018 shared	50 %
Select Tomáš KUBÍN	Tomáš KUBÍN	Patriots	Czechia	69 % of 4 084 shared	68 %
Select Jaroslav BŽOCH	Jaroslav BŽOCH	Patriots	Czechia	69 % of 4 133 shared	68 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	69 % of 4 016 shared	68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	9 Feb 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	TRAN	18 Sept 2026
VAT reverse-charge mechanism	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	17 Jun 2026
The EU’s approach to corporate tax policy in a changing international environment	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	4 Jun 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	22 Apr 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	22 Apr 2026
Research and training programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2028-2032, complementing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and providing for the Community’s contribution to the ITER project	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	22 Apr 2026
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/101	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	22 Apr 2026
Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	22 Apr 2026
Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	9 Apr 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	7 Apr 2026

Show all 51 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

271 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 168 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Approval of the minutes of the sitting	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Agenda of the next sitting	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (A10-0199/2026 - Tomas Tobé)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (A10-0199/2026 - Tomas Tobé)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances (A10-0230/2026 - Pierfrancesco Maran)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures (A10-0201/2026 - Mohammed Chahim)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Oral explanations of votes (Rule 201)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Escalation in the Middle East (debate)	Speech	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 33

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0327	Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0308	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
27 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0227	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
9 Mar 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0175	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
9 Mar 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Elene Khoshtaria and other Political Prisoners under the Georgian Dream Regime B-10-2026-0174	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
10 Feb 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0145	Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors	—
4 Feb 2026	Escalating hybrid threats from Russia in the EU E-10-2026-000441	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	8 Jun 2026
15 Dec 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania B-10-2025-0582	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
8 Dec 2025	EU-based banks, including Raiffeisen and UniCredit, still operate in Russia, raising concerns about sanctions circumvention and undermining EU credibility E-10-2025-004854	Written questionwith 37 co-authors	16 Mar 2026
25 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine B-10-2025-0549	Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors	—
15 Oct 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections B-10-2025-0455	Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors	—
6 Oct 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure B-10-2025-0424	Motion for a resolutionwith 21 co-authors	—
2 Oct 2025	Russian jets violating Estonian airspace P-10-2025-003855	Priority written questionwith 17 co-authors	4 Dec 2025
29 Sept 2025	Russian drones violating Poland’s airspace P-10-2025-003780	Priority written questionwith 30 co-authors	4 Nov 2025
2 Jul 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians B-10-2025-0308	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
5 May 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia B-10-2025-0258	Motion for a resolutionwith 21 co-authors	—
31 Mar 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus – threats from the Investigative Committee B-10-2025-0223	Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors	—
19 Mar 2025	Seizing the Russian shadow fleet in the Baltic Sea: the Commission’s measures to prevent vessel sales E-10-2025-001174	Written questionwith 60 co-authors	29 Jul 2025
7 Mar 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression B-10-2025-0168	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
5 Mar 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the white paper on the future of European defence B-10-2025-0149	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
10 Feb 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia B-10-2025-0118	Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors	—
20 Jan 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine B-10-2025-0079	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
16 Dec 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION 11th year of the occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol by the Russian Federation and the deteriorating human rights situation in occupied Crimea, notably the cases of Iryna Danylovych, Tofik Abdulhaziiev and Amet Suleymanov B-10-2024-0235	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
25 Nov 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia B-10-2024-0200	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
22 Nov 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud B-10-2024-0184	Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors	—
6 Nov 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against Russia B-10-2024-0166	Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors	—
16 Oct 2024	Fund for the protection and development of the frontier regions of countries bordering Ukraine, Belarus and Russia E-10-2024-002090	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	10 Jan 2025
7 Oct 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas B-10-2024-0118	Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors	—
2 Oct 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections B-10-2024-0073	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
20 Sept 2024	EU funding of physical border protection structures such as walls, fences or other barriers at the external border G-10-2024-001002	Major interpellationwith 29 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States B-10-2024-0039	Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors	—
16 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus B-10-2024-0053	Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors	—
19 Aug 2024	EU funding of physical border protection structures such as walls, fences or other barriers P-10-2024-001520	Priority written questionwith 24 co-authors	1 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 37

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
9 Jul 2026	VAT reverse-charge mechanism ECON-AM-790253	ECON	10
1 Jul 2026	Draft amending budget no 2 to the general budget 2026 - update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure BUDG-AM-790749	BUDG	2
10 Jun 2026	The EU’s approach to corporate tax policy in a changing international environment ECON-AM-789934	ECON	17
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896	ITRE	2
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788849	ITRE	3
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892	ITRE	3
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903	ITRE	7
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902	ITRE	2
13 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities BUDG-AM-788868	BUDG	7
13 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities BUDG-AM-788876	BUDG	11

Show all 37 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28615?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Roberts ZĪLE”. Member record. memberId 28615. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28615?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28615. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28615?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-28615,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Roberts ZĪLE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28615?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28615?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28615. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28615. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 33

Amendments tabled in committee, 37

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928