Skip to content

Member

Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ

S&D · Spain

Group
S&D
Country
Spain
Roll-call participation
91.0 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 5 390 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSOE Partido Socialista Obrero Español
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
102 of 5 301 votesⓘ
Committees
INTA, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
28347
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.0 %

5 392 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (+1.1 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

5 243 of 5 390 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (+1.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.9 %

102 of 5 301 votes where their group had a clear line

63 opposite (for ↔ against), 34 abstained against the line, 5 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.0 %

109 of 5 392 votes cast

Participation 91.0 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ91.0 %
S&D median89.9 %
Lowest in the group30.4 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members138
With majority line 97.3 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ97.3 %
S&D median96.3 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members138
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 2 406 for, 214 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 1 470 for, 117 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 3 334 for, 270 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 2 327 for, 272 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 1 433 for, 153 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 44 349 for, 228 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 2 340 for, 285 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 1 358 for, 210 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 41 362 for, 214 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 2 337 for, 303 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 1 532 for, 42 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 2 433 for, 135 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 1 548 for, 37 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 215 for, 294 against, 144 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 278 for, 304 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 3 399 for, 182 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 2 299 for, 354 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 1 435 for, 197 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 4 353 for, 224 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 3 330 for, 256 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 2 339 for, 302 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 1 539 for, 20 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 3 388 for, 169 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 2 472 for, 133 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 1 501 for, 61 against, 74 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 194 for, 309 against, 145 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 5 342 for, 280 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 4 601 for, 46 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 2 490 for, 141 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 1 406 for, 200 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 545 for, 47 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 470 for, 129 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after recital F 213 for, 426 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 218 for, 434 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 220 for, 432 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 175 for, 438 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 205 for, 442 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 216 for, 439 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 231 for, 426 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034 Final votePassed 625 for, 20 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-Norway Agreement on the participation of Norway in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 612 for, 8 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2028-2034 Final votePassed 600 for, 21 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-Iceland Agreement on the participation of Iceland in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 631 for, 7 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 549 for, 75 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-UK Agreement regarding cooperation on the application of their respective competition laws Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 640 for, 5 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Final votePassed 496 for, 53 against, 125 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 86 to Article 9, paragraph 2 131 for, 532 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 85, adding text after Article 8 138 for, 532 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 84 to Article 4, after paragraph 1 168 for, 505 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 530 for, 125 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 16 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129129
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245756
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244544
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254544
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228194
13 Mar 2025240
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251247
3 Apr 20256260
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 20252200
8 May 20251030
21 May 202522
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258786
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255554
9 Jul 2025134133
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 202510198
10 Sept 20253432
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202530
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186183
23 Oct 20255553
13 Nov 2025267261
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266766
21 Jan 2026112110
22 Jan 20265857
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141139
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197194
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202630
26 Mar 2026690
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225222
29 Apr 2026296292
30 Apr 20266866
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269696
21 May 20269898
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264039
17 Jun 2026127125
18 Jun 20267777
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144141
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155151
16 Sept 20268079
17 Sept 2026124124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain99 % of 4 574 shared93 %
Rosa SERRANO SIERRA S&DSpain99 % of 5 357 shared93 %
Marcos ROS SEMPERE S&DSpain99 % of 5 019 shared93 %
Elena SANCHO MURILLO S&DSpain99 % of 5 363 shared93 %
Idoia MENDIA S&DSpain99 % of 5 248 shared93 %
José CEPEDA S&DSpain99 % of 4 601 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain99 % of 3 619 shared93 %
César LUENA S&DSpain99 % of 5 042 shared93 %
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ S&DSpain99 % of 4 943 shared93 %
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ S&DSpain99 % of 4 691 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia90 % of 4 586 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance89 % of 4 822 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium89 % of 3 848 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance89 % of 5 135 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania89 % of 5 106 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands89 % of 5 314 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg89 % of 5 058 shared86 %
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU RenewRomania89 % of 4 446 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia89 % of 5 036 shared86 %
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG RenewNetherlands89 % of 4 542 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationChair3 Oct 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean CommunityDAND DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationMember19 Sept 20242 Oct 2024

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationINTA10 Sept 2026
No dossier namedDelegation chairD-CA11 May 2026
Dossier reference: ECON/10/05497 \nECON Committee mission to Canada, 25-29 May 2026Official delegationD-CA11 May 2026
Conclusion of a broad package of agreements to consolidate, deepen and expand the bilateral relations with the Swiss ConfederationShadow rapporteur for an opinionINTA14 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationINTA10 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationINTA9 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE15 Jan 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionINTA11 Nov 2025
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereigntyOpinion rapporteurINTA11 Nov 2025
No dossier namedDelegation chairD-CA3 Oct 2025

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 35 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 5

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
28 Apr 2026Compatibility of the principle of ‘national priority’ with EU law E-10-2026-001720Written questionwith 19 co-authors1 Jul 2026
10 Feb 2026Tragic incident in Chios E-10-2026-000548Written questionwith 14 co-authors8 Apr 2026
9 Sept 2025Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482Written questionwith 108 co-authors4 Nov 2025
4 Dec 2024Implementation of Directive 2021/1883 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of highly qualified employment E-10-2024-002755Written question29 Apr 2025

Show all 5 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 12

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
20 Apr 2026Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Mexico CJ38-AM-787715 CJ3813
24 Mar 2026Interim report in view of the consent procedure on a broad package of agreements to consolidate, deepen and expand the bilateral relations with the Swiss Confederation LIBE-AM-786747 LIBE3
5 Mar 2026Role of trade in strengthening the EU's economic security INTA-AM-785273 INTA35
15 Dec 2025The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025 LIBE-AM-781446 LIBE58
5 Dec 2025Addressing the negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market INTA-AM-781298 INTA17
27 Oct 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level LIBE-AM-779328 LIBE33
12 Sept 2025EU-US political relations INTA-AM-775733 INTA15
18 Feb 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report LIBE-AM-769958 LIBE19
18 Feb 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report LIBE-AM-769959 LIBE3
18 Feb 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report LIBE-AM-768144 LIBE22

Show all 12 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Spain National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ”. Member record. memberId 28347. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28347?page=4&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28347. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28347?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-28347,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28347?page=4&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28347?page=4&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28347. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28347. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}