Skip to content

Member

Manfred WEBER

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
81.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.0 %ⓘ of 508 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
2 of 473 votesⓘ
Member id
28229
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.9 %

508 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−8.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.0 %

503 of 508 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 473 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 508 votes cast

Participation 81.9 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Manfred WEBER81.9 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 99.0 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Manfred WEBER99.0 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 69 — part 3 305 for, 309 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 69 — part 2 355 for, 155 against, 159 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 69 — part 1 528 for, 75 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 68 208 for, 400 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 68 198 for, 459 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 68 480 for, 130 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 108 to paragraph 68 97 for, 517 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 14 to paragraph 68 231 for, 390 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 66 200 for, 425 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 64 102 for, 528 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 63 54 for, 569 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 63 52 for, 566 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 63 65 for, 571 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 2 227 for, 425 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 1 122 for, 502 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 61 64 for, 514 against, 93 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 59 476 for, 184 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 58 62 for, 588 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 58 — part 4 467 for, 114 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 58 — part 3 373 for, 279 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 62 to paragraph 58 258 for, 383 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 57 191 for, 445 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 57 466 for, 176 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 56 209 for, 283 against, 180 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 98, adding text after paragraph 55 92 for, 541 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 61 to paragraph 54 176 for, 459 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 52 439 for, 136 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 48 188 for, 473 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 47 203 for, 456 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 47 203 for, 448 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 2 316 for, 281 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 1 478 for, 102 against, 94 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 44 — part 2 513 for, 122 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 44 — part 1 561 for, 76 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 101 to paragraph 39 159 for, 442 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 11 to paragraph 37 236 for, 427 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 100 to paragraph 34 281 for, 318 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 33 581 for, 41 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 32 485 for, 129 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 10 to paragraph 32 219 for, 445 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 29 — part 3 528 for, 63 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 29 — part 2 567 for, 27 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 22 523 for, 76 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 84, adding text after paragraph 22 457 for, 172 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 22 77 for, 510 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 22 91 for, 501 against, 85 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 55 to paragraph 20 379 for, 270 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 19 — part 4 469 for, 132 against, 69 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 19 — part 3 466 for, 142 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 19 — part 2 409 for, 208 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany99 % of 2 852 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany99 % of 4 200 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany99 % of 3 795 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany99 % of 4 567 shared89 %
Lena DÜPONT EPPGermany99 % of 4 098 shared89 %
Andrea WECHSLER EPPGermany99 % of 4 481 shared89 %
Stefan KÖHLER EPPGermany99 % of 4 286 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany99 % of 4 182 shared89 %
Marion WALSMANN EPPGermany99 % of 4 620 shared89 %
Verena MERTENS EPPGermany99 % of 4 306 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia90 % of 4 221 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania89 % of 4 044 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania89 % of 3 370 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland89 % of 3 629 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium89 % of 4 474 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland88 % of 4 563 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany88 % of 3 124 shared82 %
Jan-Christoph OETJEN RenewGermany88 % of 4 489 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium88 % of 4 174 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 470 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 26 on behalf of their group; 127 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 6 minRead
7 Jul 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Jun 2026Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 4 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 5 minRead
11 Feb 2026Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 4 minRead
21 Jan 2026European Council meeting (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 6 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 6 minRead
15 Dec 2025Order of business on behalf of EPPSpeech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2025The situation of Christian communities and religious minorities in Nigeria and the Middle East, and Europe’s responsibility to protect them and guarantee freedom of conscience (topical debate) Speech · 3 minRead

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
19 Sept 2024Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770Written questionwith 20 co-authors17 Dec 2024
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
26 Mar 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 as regards certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countries AGRI-AM-785380 AGRI8

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Manfred WEBER”. Member record. memberId 28229. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=103&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28229?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-28229,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Manfred WEBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=103&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=103&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28229. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}