Skip to content

Member

Antonín STANĚK

Patriots · Czechia

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Czechia
Roll-call participation
95.8 %ⓘ of 3 630 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
84.4 %ⓘ of 3 466 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
AUTO Motoristé sobě
In office
Since 4 Oct 2025
Against clear line
225 of 2 777 votesⓘ
Committees
CULT, ENVI
Member id
272024
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.8 %

3 478 of 3 630 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+4.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.4 %

2 925 of 3 466 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+1.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

8.1 %

225 of 2 777 votes where their group had a clear line

54 opposite (for ↔ against), 158 abstained against the line, 13 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.9 %

485 of 3 478 votes cast

Participation 95.8 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Antonín STANĚK95.8 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 84.4 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Antonín STANĚK84.4 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 630

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 101 to Article 47 48 for, 520 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 93, adding text after Article 45 92 for, 496 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 92 to Article 45 79 for, 501 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 91 to Article 42 54 for, 511 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 90 to Article 15 48 for, 521 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 89 to Article 2 51 for, 509 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (Resolution) Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 572 for, 18 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 515 for, 93 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore Final vote on the motion for a resolutionRejected 136 for, 432 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Final votePassed 543 for, 72 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 1, adding text after recital 5 73 for, 548 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 4 to Article 1 80 for, 544 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 2 to Article 1– paragraph 1 106 for, 507 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Referral back to committee 426 for, 202 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 3 to Article 1 79 for, 539 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Final votePassed 382 for, 249 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 265 to recital 28 203 for, 423 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 228 + 287 (voted as one) to recital 26 360 for, 277 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 286 to recital 24 294 for, 337 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 364 for, 269 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 260 to recital 19 183 for, 457 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 226 + 284 (voted as one) to recital 18 363 for, 276 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 259 to recital 18 179 for, 457 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 365 for, 271 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 352 to recital 14 181 for, 453 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 364 for, 266 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 367 for, 270 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 351 to recital 9 186 for, 441 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 222 + 280 (voted as one) to recital 7 361 for, 274 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 350 to recital 7 181 for, 444 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 221 + 279 (voted as one) to recital 5 366 for, 273 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 349 to recital 5 179 for, 450 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 394, adding text after recital 2 182 for, 446 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 393 to recital 2 183 for, 445 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 254 + 316 + 2 (voted as one) to Article 4 368 for, 271 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 536 for, 100 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 219 to Article 4 201 for, 426 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 217 to Article 4 210 for, 423 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 215 to Article 4 211 for, 423 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 212 to Article 4 209 for, 422 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 210 to Article 4 209 for, 425 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 208 to Article 4 207 for, 430 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 207 + 266 + 348 (voted as one) to Article 4 251 for, 378 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 253 + 315 (voted as one) to Article 4 361 for, 280 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 115 to Article 4 238 for, 395 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 205 to Article 4 94 for, 532 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 252 + 314 (voted as one) to Article 4 364 for, 270 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 364 for, 270 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 311 + 398 (voted as one) to Article 4 365 for, 276 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 308 to Article 4 114 for, 522 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal89 % of 2 686 shared74 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia87 % of 1 204 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia87 % of 3 258 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal86 % of 3 360 shared74 %
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU PatriotsGreece83 % of 3 075 shared74 %
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly83 % of 1 210 shared74 %
Aldo PATRICIELLO PatriotsItaly83 % of 1 378 shared74 %
Anders VISTISEN Former memberPatriotsDenmark82 % of 1 510 shared74 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium82 % of 3 468 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium82 % of 3 420 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance78 % of 3 275 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance77 % of 3 265 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance77 % of 3 430 shared68 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance75 % of 3 115 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance75 % of 2 242 shared70 %
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA ECRCroatia75 % of 2 843 shared68 %
Marco SQUARTA ECRItaly74 % of 2 460 shared68 %
Mario MANTOVANI ECRItaly74 % of 2 327 shared68 %
Giuseppe MILAZZO ECRItaly73 % of 1 853 shared68 %
Jacek OZDOBA ECRPoland73 % of 2 989 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeMember15 Dec 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember21 Oct 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute18 Dec 2025now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS DelegationMember18 Dec 2025now
Delegation for relations with the Korean PeninsulaDKOR DelegationSubstitute18 Dec 2025now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeMember21 Oct 202514 Dec 2025
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember21 Oct 202514 Dec 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

14 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 17 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026The impact of the implementation of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) on SMEs, its administrative burden and challenges for the European Single Market (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 2026Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2026Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate) SpeechRead
18 Jun 2026Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2026Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2026Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Cutting red tape to enable a competitive and clean transition – the urgent need to shorten and simplify permitting (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026International Day of Education, fighting inequalities in access to education (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026European Council meeting (joint debate) Speech · 2 minRead
16 Dec 2025Condemnation of the terrorist attack against the Hanukkah celebrations in Sydney and solidarity with the victims and their families (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Dec 2025Presentation of the automotive package (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Nov 2025Effective use of the EU trade and industrial policy to tackle China’s export restrictions (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Questions and motions, 34

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026Fragmentation and interoperability of electric vehicle charging services in the EU E-10-2026-003561Written questionNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Adhering to the timeline for the European Disability Card E-10-2026-003450Written questionwith 10 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Jul 2026Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035Written questionwith 42 co-authors11 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission regulation amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards lead in certain fishing tackle (D110163/04 – 2026/2714(RPS)) B-10-2026-0344Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
30 Jun 2026Erasmus Mundus: academic excellence programme or migration pathway? E-10-2026-002701Written questionwith 20 co-authors19 Aug 2026
8 Jun 2026Jean Monnet Actions European funding of universities and promotion of the federalist project E-10-2026-002346Written questionwith 8 co-authors24 Jul 2026
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—
30 Apr 2026Systemic shortcomings in food safety controls and imports in the EU E-10-2026-001772Written questionwith 18 co-authors3 Jul 2026
22 Apr 2026Clarification on the architecture of the national regional partnership framework P-10-2026-001635Priority written question11 Jun 2026

Show all 34 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
28 Jul 2026Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123 ENVI22
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI21
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI25
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI56
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI38
20 Jul 2026Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790834 ENVI26
15 Jul 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790846 ENVI5
10 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789913 ENVI10
1 Jul 2026Suspending the application of the rules on the appointment of an authorised representative for extended producer responsibility for batteries and waste batteries and packaging and packaging waste ENVI-AM-790771 ENVI14
1 Jul 2026Suspending the application of the rules on the appointment of authorised representatives for extended producer responsibility for waste, waste electrical and electronical equipment and single use plastic waste ENVI-AM-790772 ENVI11

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Czechia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Antonín STANĚK”. Member record. memberId 272024. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/272024?page=62&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/272024. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/272024?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-272024,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Antonín STANĚK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/272024?page=62&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/272024?page=62&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 272024. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/272024. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}