Skip to content

Member

Alessandro ZAN

S&D · Italy

Group
S&D
Country
Italy
Roll-call participation
91.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.9 %ⓘ of 569 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PD Partito Democratico
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
8 of 563 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO (substitute), JURI (substitute), LIBE (vice-chair)
Member id
257106
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.8 %

569 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+2.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.9 %

557 of 569 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+0.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.4 %

8 of 563 votes where their group had a clear line

7 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

3 of 569 votes cast

Participation 91.8 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Alessandro ZAN91.8 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 97.9 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Alessandro ZAN97.9 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Annalisa CORRADO S&DItaly96 % of 4 519 shared93 %
Sandro RUOTOLO S&DItaly96 % of 4 225 shared93 %
Matteo RICCI S&DItaly96 % of 4 507 shared93 %
Alessandra MORETTI S&DItaly96 % of 5 299 shared93 %
Giuseppe LUPO S&DItaly96 % of 5 235 shared93 %
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly96 % of 5 410 shared93 %
Antonio DECARO Former memberS&DItaly95 % of 2 063 shared93 %
Nicola ZINGARETTI S&DItaly95 % of 5 024 shared93 %
Brando BENIFEI S&DItaly95 % of 4 356 shared93 %
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly95 % of 2 985 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Irena JOVEVA RenewSlovenia88 % of 5 254 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands87 % of 5 493 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium87 % of 4 082 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia87 % of 5 345 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands87 % of 5 557 shared86 %
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG RenewNetherlands87 % of 4 734 shared86 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia87 % of 5 532 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia87 % of 4 898 shared86 %
Michal WIEZIK RenewSlovakia87 % of 5 147 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia87 % of 5 141 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblySubstitute22 Apr 2026now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblySubstitute22 Apr 2026now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE14 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE12 Jan 2026
Implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the EU legal frameworkShadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE28 Oct 2025
Implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the EU legal frameworkRapporteurAFCO6 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE5 May 2025
Opinion on Rule of Law Report 2024Shadow rapporteur for an opinionJURI29 Jan 2025
The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report - 2024/2078(INI)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionJURI29 Jan 2025
Negotiations under rule 56 RoPShadow rapporteur for an opinionJURI28 Jan 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurLIBE24 Sept 2024
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairLIBE22 Jul 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

20 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 26 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
20 May 2026Rights, support and protection of victims of crime (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026European Citizens’ Initiative 'Ban on conversion practices in the European Union' (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
10 Feb 2026Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Dec 2025The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
24 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Criminal intimidation against investigative journalists in the EU: the attempted attack on Sigfrido Ranucci (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2025Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2025Freedom of assembly in Hungary and the need for the Commission to act (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 20 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 85

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
13 Sept 2026Repeated ban on Oradea Pride and compliance with fundamental rights in the use of EU funds E-10-2026-003648Written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
9 Jun 2026Protection of Italian citizen Nessy Guerra and her daughter, a minor, in Egypt E-10-2026-002377Written questionwith 23 co-authors7 Aug 2026
19 May 2026Use of Hungarian public funds for organised activities concerning transnational political influence in the EU democratic space E-10-2026-002058Written questionwith 12 co-authors1 Sept 2026
19 May 2026Employment conditions at the Italian National Institute of Astrophysics and protection of EU research funds E-10-2026-002070Written questionwith 6 co-authors3 Jul 2026
19 May 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on holding Israel to account for breaches of human rights and international law B-10-2026-0267Motion for a resolutionwith 55 co-authors—
13 May 2026Another shooting attack by Libyan militias on the humanitarian vessel Sea-Watch 5 E-10-2026-002019Written questionwith 31 co-authors10 Aug 2026
11 May 2026The compatibility with EU law of the Italian 2026 Security Law’s video surveillance measure E-10-2026-001948Written questionwith 15 co-authors18 Sept 2026
21 Apr 2026Customs practices related to products imported from illegal Israeli settlements in the OPTs E-10-2026-001633Written questionwith 71 co-authors16 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026Latest report of the UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese on the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and on human rights violations by Israel E-10-2026-001417Written questionwith 10 co-authors5 Jun 2026
7 Mar 2026Use of Emissions Trading System revenues and Italian ‘Energy Decree’ E-10-2026-000946Written questionwith 14 co-authors29 Apr 2026
5 Mar 2026Air fares and protecting Europeans stranded abroad following the escalation in the Middle East E-10-2026-000932Written questionwith 10 co-authors11 May 2026
24 Feb 2026Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756Written questionwith 17 co-authors29 Apr 2026
12 Feb 2026EU intervention following the severe environmental disaster caused by Cyclone Harry in southern Italy E-10-2026-000629Written questionwith 23 co-authors4 May 2026
6 Feb 2026The case of Vincenzo Fullone and violations of human rights by Israeli authorities E-10-2026-000496Written questionwith 33 co-authors13 Apr 2026
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026
29 Jan 2026Activating EU funds and support instruments for Sicily, Sardinia and Calabria in the wake of Cyclone Harry P-10-2026-000378Priority written questionwith 20 co-authors12 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026EU response to recent US statements concerning Colombia, Mexico, Cuba and Greenland, and respect for international law and treaties E-10-2026-000146Written questionwith 23 co-authors16 Mar 2026
11 Dec 2025Return Detention Centre in Albania and compliance with EU legislation E-10-2025-004913Written questionwith 8 co-authors9 Mar 2026
8 Dec 2025Risk of a common procurement for landmines according to Security Action for Europe Regulation E-10-2025-004843Written questionwith 21 co-authors11 Mar 2026
8 Dec 2025The deportation to Albania of detainees with severe mental health problems held in Italian pre-removal centres E-10-2025-004848Written questionwith 14 co-authors1 Apr 2026
20 Nov 2025EU funding of companies linked to spyware and illegal surveillance E-10-2025-004636Written questionwith 54 co-authors20 Feb 2026
12 Nov 2025The sacking of journalist Gabriele Nunziati over a question he asked the Commission E-10-2025-004502Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
5 Nov 2025EU complicity in abuses under the Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding E-10-2025-004366Written questionwith 38 co-authors2 Mar 2026
22 Oct 2025Delay in reporting by the Commission E-10-2025-004164Written questionwith 7 co-authors13 Jan 2026
20 Oct 2025Gas exploration licences in Palestinian maritime areas E-10-2025-004122Written questionwith 17 co-authors22 Dec 2025
17 Oct 2025Accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza E-10-2025-004109Written questionwith 47 co-authors13 Jan 2026
13 Oct 2025Follow-up: protection of Hungarian citizens against biometric surveillance: follow-up of question for written answer E-002415/2025 E-10-2025-004013Written questionwith 41 co-authors5 Mar 2026
19 Sept 2025Israeli restrictions on international NGOs and GDPR adequacy decision E-10-2025-003642Written questionwith 17 co-authors23 Apr 2026
15 Sept 2025Tackling digital violence: eID identification requirement for high-risk platforms E-10-2025-003551Written questionwith 8 co-authors6 Nov 2025
9 Sept 2025Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482Written questionwith 108 co-authors4 Nov 2025
28 Aug 2025Attack against a humanitarian rescue vessel E-10-2025-003330Written questionwith 25 co-authors5 Dec 2025
17 Jul 2025Humanitarian aid in Gaza and occupied West Bank and possibility of suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement E-10-2025-002981Written questionwith 30 co-authors2 Oct 2025
16 Jul 2025Concerns over Israeli online campaigns and enforcement of DSA obligations E-10-2025-002936Written questionwith 31 co-authors12 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list B-10-2025-0315Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
1 Jul 2025Returns of migrants from detention centres in Albania and breach of Directive 2008/115/EC by the Italian Government E-10-2025-002653Written questionwith 30 co-authors15 Sept 2025
25 Jun 2025Checking compliance of Italian exports of military technology to Israel with the EU criteria in Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP E-10-2025-002559Written questionwith 7 co-authors13 Aug 2025
20 Jun 2025Implementation of Italy’s NRRP and problems caused by delays P-10-2025-002482Priority written questionwith 20 co-authors7 Oct 2025
16 Jun 2025Protection of Hungarian citizens’ fundamental rights in the context of biometric identification and surveillance at public gatherings E-10-2025-002415Written questionwith 59 co-authors1 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025US decision to suspend student visas and social media screening E-10-2025-002295Written questionwith 45 co-authors12 Aug 2025
4 Jun 2025Authorisation of available treatments for feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) E-10-2025-002247Written questionwith 9 co-authors20 Aug 2025
4 Jun 2025‘Safe third country’ concept E-10-2025-002241Written questionwith 35 co-authors4 Aug 2025
26 May 2025Independence and impartiality of the UNAR (Italian equality body) E-10-2025-002106Written questionwith 6 co-authors14 Jul 2025
16 May 2025Urgent action required for the immediate closure of the Italian migrant detention centre in Trapani E-10-2025-001971Written questionwith 20 co-authors15 Sept 2025
6 May 2025Israeli Gaza Strip occupation plan P-10-2025-001825Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors16 Jul 2025
24 Apr 2025Incompatibility of Hungarian constitutional amendment with EU law E-10-2025-001658Written questionwith 17 co-authors2 Jul 2025
23 Apr 2025Acquisition of X by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI E-10-2025-001615Written questionwith 42 co-authors14 Jul 2025
23 Apr 2025Suspension of the right to apply for asylum in Poland and pushback reports from the Poland-Belarus border E-10-2025-001623Written questionwith 2 co-authors18 Jul 2025
8 Apr 2025Pre-removal detention centres (CPRs) in Albania and compliance with EU rules, principles and standards E-10-2025-001425Written questionwith 19 co-authors3 Jul 2025
7 Apr 2025Information on the first-ever European-wide enquiry on the impact of social media on the well-being of young people E-10-2025-001411Written questionwith 22 co-authors14 Jul 2025
1 Apr 2025Withdrawal of the Horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive P-10-2025-001330Priority written questionwith 40 co-authors21 May 2025
18 Mar 2025Withdrawal of the proposed horizontal anti-discrimination directive P-10-2025-001148Priority written questionwith 46 co-authors24 Jul 2025
6 Mar 2025Urgent measures for sea rescue E-10-2025-000979Written questionwith 28 co-authors19 Jun 2025
11 Feb 2025Impact of ongoing investigation into the work of Hungary’s Integrity Authority E-10-2025-000635Written questionwith 8 co-authors2 May 2025
11 Feb 2025Trump declarations on Gaza and the Palestinian people E-10-2025-000612Written questionwith 55 co-authors3 Apr 2025
11 Feb 2025The use of Paragon Solutions spyware against journalists E-10-2025-000617Written questionwith 23 co-authors11 Jun 2025
10 Feb 2025Use of Paragon Solutions spyware against journalists and civil society representatives E-10-2025-000600Written questionwith 14 co-authors11 Apr 2025
30 Jan 2025Meta’s recent decision to end fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp in the United States E-10-2025-000423Written questionwith 31 co-authors31 Mar 2025
28 Jan 2025Recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the systematic practice of pushbacks in Greece E-10-2025-000386Written questionwith 17 co-authors15 May 2025
28 Jan 2025Meta’s discriminatory terms and conditions against the LGBTQIA+ community under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-000384Written questionwith 34 co-authors28 Mar 2025
20 Jan 2025Intimidation of journalists and media freedom in Hungary E-10-2025-000230Written questionwith 7 co-authors8 Apr 2025
17 Jan 2025Actual or foreseeable negative effects of Elon Musk’s statements on civic discourse, electoral processes and freedom and pluralism of the media under the DSA E-10-2025-000191Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Mar 2025
14 Jan 2025Violations identified by the Council of Europe anti-torture committee in detention and return centres in Italy E-10-2025-000124Written questionwith 31 co-authors29 Apr 2025
14 Jan 2025Request for urgent action concerning the inclusion of announced US sanctions against the ICC in the annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 (Blocking Statute) P-10-2025-000121Priority written questionwith 29 co-authors10 Feb 2025
13 Jan 2025The impact of Starlink on the European satellite internet service market E-10-2025-000092Written questionwith 17 co-authors19 Mar 2025
13 Jan 2025Safeguarding digital sovereignty in Italy’s national recovery and resilience plan: the case of Starlink E-10-2025-000091Written questionwith 17 co-authors13 Mar 2025
19 Dec 2024Energy from renewable sources – EU legislation and Member States’ measures E-10-2024-003053Written questionwith 16 co-authors20 Mar 2025
6 Dec 2024Transparency of funds, funding to neo-fascist movements and Pro Vita & Famiglia’s compliance with EU transparency register rules E-10-2024-002801Written questionwith 9 co-authors21 Mar 2025
5 Dec 2024Conditions for workers in the automotive industry E-10-2024-002785Written questionwith 20 co-authors30 Apr 2025
29 Nov 2024Incompatibility between the list of safe countries of origin made by the Italian Government and the criteria laid down in EU law E-10-2024-002701Written questionwith 29 co-authors14 May 2025
28 Nov 2024Blatant disregard of International Criminal Court decisions by the Hungarian Prime Minister E-10-2024-002697Written questionwith 45 co-authors6 Feb 2025
26 Nov 2024Conflicts of interest and political interference by Elon Musk E-10-2024-002653Written questionwith 29 co-authors20 Feb 2025
21 Nov 2024Change of algorithm on X before US election P-10-2024-002623Priority written questionwith 41 co-authors12 Feb 2025
11 Nov 2024Fund for asbestos victims E-10-2024-002487Written questionwith 3 co-authors17 Jan 2025
8 Nov 2024The crisis surrounding Beko Europe and worker protection E-10-2024-002475Written questionwith 21 co-authors6 Jan 2025
4 Nov 2024Design and construction of the bridge over the Strait of Messina: cost and division into lots E-10-2024-002400Written questionwith 9 co-authors7 Mar 2025
22 Oct 2024Compliance of the Italy-Albania protocol with EU law P-10-2024-002206Priority written questionwith 28 co-authors5 Feb 2025
17 Oct 2024Launch of European humanitarian corridors from Lebanon to the EU E-10-2024-002127Written questionwith 55 co-authors12 Feb 2025
25 Sept 2024Approval of the draft law on security and breach of EU principles E-10-2024-001823Written questionwith 20 co-authors13 Nov 2024
24 Sept 2024Human rights violations by EU-funded forces in Tunisia E-10-2024-001795Written questionwith 48 co-authors12 Mar 2025
14 Sept 2024Recent massacre in the Al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’ in the Gaza Strip P-10-2024-001714Priority written questionwith 18 co-authors18 Dec 2024
12 Sept 2024LGBTQIA+ rights in Italy – Sasso motion E-10-2024-001697Written questionwith 9 co-authors20 Nov 2024
10 Sept 2024Breach of the rule of law and the fundamental rights of inmates in Italy’s prisons E-10-2024-001665Written questionwith 4 co-authors18 Nov 2024
4 Sept 2024Police searches of media outlets: the case of Il Corriere Fiorentino E-10-2024-001615Written questionwith 20 co-authors25 Oct 2024
8 Aug 2024Human rights violations in the ‘death zone’ between Poland and Belarus P-10-2024-001503Priority written questionwith 4 co-authors10 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 35

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058 CJ655
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059 CJ6511
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062 CJ6515
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061 CJ6515
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057 CJ651
10 Apr 2026Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695 ITRE-AM-786968 ITRE1
10 Apr 2026Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695 ITRE-AM-786960 ITRE2
10 Apr 2026Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695 ITRE-AM-786953 ITRE2
6 Feb 2026Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission AFCO-AM-784243 AFCO13
15 Dec 2025The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025 LIBE-AM-781446 LIBE96

Show all 35 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Alessandro ZAN”. Member record. memberId 257106. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257106?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257106. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257106?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257106,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Alessandro ZAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257106?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257106?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257106. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257106. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}