Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member

Stanisław TYSZKA

ESN · Poland

Group
ESN
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
68.6 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
78.5 %ⓘ of 4 060 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 94.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
Konfederacja Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
701 of 3 859 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO, BUDG (substitute)
Member id
257062
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

68.6 %

4 066 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

ESN median: 91.3 % (−22.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

78.5 %

3 189 of 4 060 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 94.6 % (−16.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

18.2 %

701 of 3 859 votes where their group had a clear line

244 opposite (for ↔ against), 323 abstained against the line, 134 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

12.5 %

510 of 4 066 votes cast

Participation 68.6 % — ESN median 91.3 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Stanisław TYSZKA68.6 %
ESN median91.3 %
Lowest in the group68.6 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members27
With majority line 78.5 % — ESN median 94.6 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Stanisław TYSZKA78.5 %
ESN median94.6 %
Lowest in the group70.6 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members27
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 45 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242320
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249290
7 Oct 202420
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202420
22 Oct 2024100
23 Oct 20241290
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202420
14 Nov 20243635
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245750
17 Dec 2024130
18 Dec 20243331
19 Dec 20244544
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254545
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 20253226
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253029
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202598
12 Mar 2025228176
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251243
3 Apr 20256260
5 May 202550
6 May 2025100
7 May 20252200
8 May 20251030
21 May 202520
22 May 20255351
16 Jun 202520
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259189
19 Jun 20258781
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134132
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 20251010
10 Sept 2025340
11 Sept 2025690
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202550
8 Oct 2025550
9 Oct 2025650
20 Oct 202530
21 Oct 20251312
22 Oct 2025186170
23 Oct 20255554
13 Nov 2025267214
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 2025750
26 Nov 20251000
27 Nov 20251250
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 2025660
17 Dec 2025430
18 Dec 2025420
20 Jan 20266765
21 Jan 2026112107
22 Jan 20265855
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263834
11 Feb 20261312
12 Feb 2026141113
24 Feb 2026430
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197114
11 Mar 20266056
12 Mar 20263433
25 Mar 202630
26 Mar 20266964
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225149
29 Apr 2026296282
30 Apr 20266861
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269692
21 May 20269870
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127116
18 Jun 20267773
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267270
8 Jul 2026144141
9 Jul 20266760
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155146
16 Sept 20268076
17 Sept 2026124114

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland97 % of 2 015 shared80 %
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI ESNPoland96 % of 3 735 shared80 %
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly81 % of 1 752 shared80 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany80 % of 3 012 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany79 % of 3 728 shared80 %
Tomasz FROELICH ESNGermany79 % of 3 989 shared80 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany79 % of 3 599 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany79 % of 3 843 shared80 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany78 % of 3 149 shared80 %
Stanislav STOYANOV ESNBulgaria78 % of 3 870 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland78 % of 1 204 shared70 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland76 % of 3 525 shared69 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland75 % of 4 007 shared69 %
Mieke ANDRIESE PatriotsNetherlands75 % of 1 997 shared70 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance74 % of 3 749 shared64 %
Georg MAYER PatriotsAustria74 % of 3 377 shared70 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium74 % of 4 060 shared70 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium73 % of 4 053 shared70 %
Anna Maria CISINT PatriotsItaly73 % of 3 522 shared70 %
Paolo BORCHIA PatriotsItaly73 % of 3 997 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countriesDMAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionAFCO23 Feb 2026
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135)Shadow rapporteurAFCO4 Feb 2026
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning the declaration of input (Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure)Shadow rapporteurAFCO14 May 2025
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure implementing the Agreement establishing the Ethics BodyShadow rapporteurAFCO24 Mar 2025
Reform of the electoral law of the European UnionShadow rapporteurAFCO14 Nov 2024

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

1 contribution recorded; 2 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Questions and motions, 31

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
6 Aug 2026Failure of the EU’s policy towards the authoritarian regime in Morocco   E-10-2026-003219Written questionNot yet answered
6 Aug 2026Loss of control over the border in Ceuta and Spain’s exclusion from the Schengen area   E-10-2026-003218Written questionNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026European Health Data Space – patient protection and implementation costs E-10-2026-003022Written question24 Sept 2026
16 Jul 2026Driver monitoring systems and the risk of privacy protections being circumvented E-10-2026-003024Written question7 Sept 2026
16 Jul 2026Chat Control: scanning of private messages E-10-2026-003023Written question18 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026Extension of digital euro obligations to Polish banks E-10-2026-002917Written question17 Sept 2026
13 Jul 2026The EU Biotech Act – implications for competitiveness and healthcare systems E-10-2026-002878Written question24 Sept 2026
13 Jul 2026Resilience of Commission buildings to heatwaves and coherence with EU policies E-10-2026-002876Written question18 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026Increasing Frontex resources and a real operational presence at the EU’s external borders E-10-2026-002808Written question31 Aug 2026
7 Jul 2026Availability of air conditioning in the context of heatwave-related deaths E-10-2026-002807Written question31 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026EIB-financing of transport investments in Morocco E-10-2026-002782Written questionNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026Impact of the upgraded EU-Ukraine DCFTA on border countries E-10-2026-002736Written question19 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026Effectiveness of the NDICI at curbing migratory pressure from North Africa E-10-2026-002734Written question2 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026Justification for continuing to implement the migration pact in its current form E-10-2026-002735Written questionNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026Increase in administrative costs for EU institutions and rationalisation of infrastructure expenditure E-10-2026-002737Written questionNot yet answered
26 Jun 2026Granting pre-accession benefits to candidate countries and compatibility with the Treaties E-10-2026-002666Written question13 Aug 2026
26 Jun 2026Mass regularisation of migrants in Spain, Schengen and the migration pact E-10-2026-002665Written question11 Sept 2026
26 Jun 2026Copenhagen economic criteria and Ukraine’s EU accession E-10-2026-002662Written question17 Aug 2026
26 Jun 2026Risk of an Member State contributions increasing in the future MFF E-10-2026-002663Written question17 Aug 2026
26 Jun 2026Glorification of the UPA and European values in Ukraine’s accession process E-10-2026-002664Written question19 Aug 2026
6 May 2026Costs of Poland’s participation in the loan for Ukraine E-10-2026-001858Written question21 Aug 2026
6 May 2026The scenario of non-payment of reparations by Russia and the cost of the loan to support Ukraine E-10-2026-001859Written question7 Aug 2026
12 Feb 2026Economic impact of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union E-10-2026-000620Written question13 May 2026
12 Feb 2026Legal concerns relating to Ukraine’s accession to the EU in 2027 under a special procedure E-10-2026-000624Written question21 May 2026
11 Feb 2026Question on the Commission’s response to rising CO<sub>2</sub> emission allowance prices under the ETS E-10-2026-000604Written question4 May 2026
11 Feb 2026Activities of the Audit Board for the Ukraine Facility P-10-2026-000605Priority written question26 Mar 2026
12 Nov 2025The risks and costs of expanding Erasmus+ at the expense of European students and taxpayers E-10-2025-004493Written question26 Jan 2026
25 Sept 2025Risk for national markets within the framework of the savings and investments union E-10-2025-003731Written question14 Nov 2025
18 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on political repression and fundamental rights in Bulgaria B-10-2025-0198Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
4 Oct 2024Irreplaceability of vehicles powered by internal combustion engines in emergency situations O-10-2024-000012Oral questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Oct 2024Revision of the ban on selling CO<sub>2</sub>-emitting cars beyond 2035 O-10-2024-000011Oral questionwith 9 co-authorsNot yet answered

Amendments tabled in committee, 10

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
29 Apr 2026Institutional aspects of artificial intelligence in the context of European integration AFCO-AM-787899 AFCO19
9 Feb 2026Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 AFCO-AM-784339 AFCO18
4 Feb 2026Guidelines for the 2027 Budget - Section III BUDG-AM-784272 BUDG12
30 Jan 2026Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 BUDG-AM-784187 BUDG4
30 Jan 2026Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 BUDG-AM-784180 BUDG12
30 Jan 2026Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 BUDG-AM-784188 BUDG9
30 Jan 2026Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 BUDG-AM-784204 BUDG9
26 Sept 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections BUDG-AM-778084 BUDG9
26 Sept 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections BUDG-AM-778074 BUDG15
24 Feb 2025Guidelines for the 2026 Budget - Section III BUDG-AM-770044 BUDG13

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257062?amendments=all&docs=all&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Stanisław TYSZKA”. Member record. memberId 257062. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257062?amendments=all&docs=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257062. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257062?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-257062,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Stanisław TYSZKA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257062?amendments=all&docs=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257062?amendments=all&docs=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257062. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257062. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}