Skip to content

Member

Michał SZCZERBA

EPP · Poland

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
98.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
93.3 %ⓘ of 610 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
14 of 569 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, ITRE (substitute), SEDE
Member id
257026
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.4 %

610 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+7.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.3 %

569 of 610 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−2.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.5 %

14 of 569 votes where their group had a clear line

9 opposite (for ↔ against), 5 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.0 %

6 of 610 votes cast

Participation 98.4 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Michał SZCZERBA98.4 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 93.3 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Michał SZCZERBA93.3 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 263 for, 108 against, 222 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2 192 for, 374 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Separate vote on paragraph 2 266 for, 304 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Final votePassed 436 for, 149 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Euratom Research and Training Programme for the period 2026-2027 complementing Horizon Europe Final votePassed 489 for, 55 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 6 to Article 1, point 2 Règlement (UE) nº 575/2013 Article 510, paragraph paragraph 7 et 8 259 for, 288 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 1 115 for, 442 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Final votePassed 374 for, 176 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 177 for, 400 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 181 for, 396 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 3 180 for, 367 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Final votePassed 411 for, 100 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 3, adding text after recital 11 164 for, 358 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 4, adding text after recital 10 217 for, 348 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 176 for, 380 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 5, adding text after recital 5 185 for, 362 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 6 to Article 2, après le paragraph 2 172 for, 376 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Final votePassed 564 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 9, adding text after recital 29 171 for, 414 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 172 for, 405 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 14, adding text after recital 27 111 for, 428 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 13, adding text after recital 27 114 for, 424 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 30, adding text after recital 1 195 for, 387 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 29, adding text after recital 1 189 for, 388 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 19, adding text after recital 1 164 for, 407 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 171 for, 407 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 17, adding text after recital 1 169 for, 415 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 27 to Annex II, point 1 Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex VII, point 1 176 for, 411 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 12 to Annex I, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex IV, point 4.1, fourth sentence 163 for, 418 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 31 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 187 for, 387 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 26 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 151 for, 421 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 25 to Article 1, alinéa 1, après le point 24 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 après l'article 32 158 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 15 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 23 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 30, paragraph 2 103 for, 438 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendments 7 + 11 (voted as one) to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 21, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 26, après le paragraph 1 105 for, 462 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 10 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 16, sous-point b Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 22, paragraph 2, point b 159 for, 411 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Request by The Left Group 102 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Request by the PfE Group 132 for, 334 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 306 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 6, adding text after recital E 172 for, 288 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 146 for, 311 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 164 for, 276 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 2 375 for, 92 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 1 444 for, 32 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 100 for, 306 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 86 for, 345 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 168 for, 312 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 281 for, 193 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 67 for, 378 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 137 for, 326 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 127 for, 321 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dariusz JOŃSKI EPPPoland97 % of 5 655 shared89 %
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ EPPPoland97 % of 5 635 shared89 %
Andrzej HALICKI EPPPoland96 % of 5 269 shared89 %
Ewa KOPACZ EPPPoland96 % of 5 750 shared89 %
Krzysztof BREJZA EPPPoland96 % of 5 348 shared89 %
Mirosława NYKIEL EPPPoland96 % of 5 158 shared89 %
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ EPPPoland96 % of 5 519 shared89 %
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ EPPPoland96 % of 5 266 shared89 %
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK EPPPoland96 % of 5 414 shared89 %
Andrzej BUŁA EPPPoland96 % of 5 292 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia84 % of 5 216 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania83 % of 5 078 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium83 % of 3 994 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium83 % of 5 595 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland83 % of 4 562 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania83 % of 4 176 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia83 % of 4 417 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium82 % of 5 293 shared82 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance82 % of 4 604 shared82 %
Grégory ALLIONE RenewFrance82 % of 4 946 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-UA DelegationMember24 Oct 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember6 Jul 2026now
Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association CommitteeDSCA DelegationVice-chair3 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblySubstitute30 Sept 2025now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET16 Sept 2026
92nd EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue, 25-26 August 2026, San Francisco, USAOfficial delegationD-US20 Aug 2026
TLD Enlarged Bureau visit to Washington 18-20 March 2026Official delegation10 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET25 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE3 Feb 2026
Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the UnionRapporteurSEDE3 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE15 Oct 2025
71st NATO PA Annual Session in Ljubljana, Slovenia 10-13 October 2025Official delegationDNAT29 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET4 Sept 2025
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sectionsOpinion rapporteurSEDE15 Jul 2025

Show all 19 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

115 contributions recorded; 10 on behalf of their group; 159 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 32

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0215Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705Written questionwith 49 co-authors14 Jul 2026
24 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on supporting democratic resilience in Armenia B-10-2026-0199Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors—
1 Apr 2026Concerns regarding the rule of law and fundamental rights in Georgia E-10-2026-001362Written questionwith 16 co-authors5 Jun 2026
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran B-10-2026-0130Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors—
21 Jan 2026Combating ageism through the intergenerational fairness strategy and the UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons E-10-2026-000227Written questionwith 7 co-authors26 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
15 Dec 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania B-10-2025-0571Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—
25 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine B-10-2025-0546Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—

Show all 32 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 31

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
27 Apr 2026Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787838 CJ051
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787836 CJ051
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787837 CJ051
14 Apr 2026Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786888 ITRE11
14 Apr 2026Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786887 ITRE8
14 Apr 2026Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786889 ITRE17
14 Apr 2026Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786879 ITRE3
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786976 CJ5737
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786977 CJ5732
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975 CJ5730

Show all 31 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Michał SZCZERBA”. Member record. memberId 257026. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257026?page=87&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257026. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257026?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257026,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Michał SZCZERBA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257026?page=87&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257026?page=87&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257026. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257026. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}