Skip to content

Member

Gordan BOSANAC

Greens · Croatia

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Croatia
Roll-call participation
98.2 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
95.4 %ⓘ of 5 819 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
Možemo!
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
220 of 5 699 votesⓘ
Committees
EMPL (substitute), PETI (substitute), REGI
Member id
256995
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.2 %

5 820 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (+6.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.4 %

5 552 of 5 819 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (−1.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.9 %

220 of 5 699 votes where their group had a clear line

89 opposite (for ↔ against), 83 abstained against the line, 48 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.6 %

265 of 5 820 votes cast

Participation 98.2 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Gordan BOSANAC98.2 %
Greens median92.2 %
Lowest in the group48.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members54
With majority line 95.4 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Gordan BOSANAC95.4 %
Greens median97.1 %
Lowest in the group87.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 201 to Article 4 92 for, 545 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 361 for, 273 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 390 to Article 4 184 for, 460 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 199 to Article 4 92 for, 542 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 274 to Article 4 198 for, 430 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 196 to Article 4 202 for, 428 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 194 + 273 (voted as one) to Article 4 210 for, 421 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 104 to Article 4 591 for, 46 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 193 to Article 4 48 for, 578 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 192 to Article 4 54 for, 585 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 191 to Article 4 47 for, 585 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 102 to Article 4 414 for, 215 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 190 to Article 4 46 for, 585 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 189 to Article 4 50 for, 583 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 188 + 388 (voted as one) to Article 4 229 for, 407 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 99 to Article 4 581 for, 49 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 187 to Article 4 51 for, 582 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to Article 4 223 for, 416 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 247 + 307 (voted as one) to Article 4 360 for, 279 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 185 to Article 4 96 for, 541 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 184 to Article 4 99 for, 533 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 183 to Article 4 99 for, 535 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 97 to Article 4 413 for, 220 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 182 to Article 4 43 for, 591 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 96 to Article 4 464 for, 172 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 181 to Article 4 50 for, 589 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 180 to Article 4 48 for, 593 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 94 to Article 4 536 for, 100 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 179 + 385 (voted as one) to Article 4 222 for, 415 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 178 + 384 (voted as one) to Article 4 225 for, 412 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 246 + 306 (voted as one) to Article 4 361 for, 282 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 177 to Article 4 95 for, 543 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 176 to Article 4 94 for, 545 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 383 to Article 4 193 for, 451 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 92 to Article 4 573 for, 57 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 175 to Article 4 62 for, 578 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 91 to Article 4 577 for, 57 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 380 to Article 4 184 for, 455 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 174 to Article 4 65 for, 568 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 173 to Article 4 162 for, 474 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 89 to Article 4 572 for, 52 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 88 to Article 4 585 for, 44 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 305 to Article 4 358 for, 277 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 86 to Article 4 271 for, 264 against, 106 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 169 to Article 4 96 for, 493 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 270 to Article 4 190 for, 442 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 82 to Article 4 248 for, 378 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 81 to Article 4 412 for, 219 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 376 to Article 4 188 for, 446 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 167 to Article 4 200 for, 418 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242319
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249289
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241312
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244541
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254544
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228223
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251251
3 Apr 20256262
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220218
8 May 2025103103
21 May 202522
22 May 2025530
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259191
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134133
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256963
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186184
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267267
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510099
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254240
20 Jan 20266766
21 Jan 2026112110
22 Jan 20265857
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141139
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197197
11 Mar 20266058
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225224
29 Apr 2026296292
30 Apr 20266867
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269695
21 May 20269898
15 Jun 202621
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127126
18 Jun 20267776
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144143
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155153
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 2026124124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium95 % of 5 088 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland95 % of 5 017 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands95 % of 4 651 shared94 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany95 % of 5 385 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland95 % of 4 297 shared94 %
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia95 % of 5 000 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany94 % of 5 761 shared94 %
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ GreensRomania94 % of 3 663 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany94 % of 5 518 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany94 % of 5 777 shared94 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Estelle CEULEMANS S&DBelgium87 % of 5 472 shared83 %
Merja KYLLÖNEN The LeftFinland87 % of 5 500 shared77 %
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance86 % of 4 589 shared83 %
Li ANDERSSON The LeftFinland86 % of 5 314 shared77 %
Jussi SARAMO The LeftFinland86 % of 5 782 shared77 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance86 % of 5 156 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 102 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance85 % of 5 351 shared83 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance85 % of 5 629 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance85 % of 4 080 shared83 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-North Macedonia Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-MK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeDSEE DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working groupMember14 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working groupMember25 Feb 2025now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Strengthening cohesion policy for the EU’s islands and coastal regionsShadow rapporteurREGI16 Sept 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1238 on a pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL30 Jan 2026
Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provisionShadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL30 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteurREGI13 Jan 2026
Implementation of the Council Recommendation of 30 October 2020 on A Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee and replacing the Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth GuaranteeShadow rapporteurEMPL23 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationPETI7 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationPETI30 Sept 2025
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Shadow rapporteur for an opinionPETI9 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationREGI8 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationREGI9 Jul 2025

Show all 19 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

49 contributions recorded; 10 on behalf of their group; 58 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 27

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
29 Jun 2026Compliance with Chapter 27 benchmarks and the EU environmental acquis in relation to developments in the Vjosa-Narta Protected Area in Albania P-10-2026-002691Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors22 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518Written questionwith 35 co-authors15 Sept 2026
12 Jun 2026Misuse of EU funds in Athens’ Prosfygika district: partnership principle violations and fundamental rights concerns E-10-2026-002432Written questionwith 27 co-authors19 Aug 2026
18 May 2026Recent legislative changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina regarding the Southern Gas Interconnection between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia E-10-2026-002030Written questionwith 3 co-authors19 Aug 2026
3 Mar 2026Visa requirement imposed by Nicaragua on certain EU citizens and application of the reciprocity mechanism P-10-2026-000868Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors31 Mar 2026
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026
21 Jan 2026Police raid on LGBT persons in Baku and Azerbaijan’s human rights obligations towards the EU E-10-2026-000215Written questionwith 12 co-authors5 May 2026
21 Jan 2026Combating ageism through the intergenerational fairness strategy and the UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons E-10-2026-000227Written questionwith 7 co-authors26 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—

Show all 27 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 36

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098 CJ7119
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790104 CJ718
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790090 CJ7113
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790156 CJ7161
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790155 CJ7147
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790158 CJ7133
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790103 CJ7168
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094 CJ7130
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790091 CJ7117
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099 CJ7124

Show all 36 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Croatia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Gordan BOSANAC”. Member record. memberId 256995. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256995?nb=all&page=63&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256995. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256995?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256995,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Gordan BOSANAC}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256995?nb=all&page=63&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256995?nb=all&page=63&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256995. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256995. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}