Skip to content

Member

Hans NEUHOFF

ESN · Germany

Group
ESN
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
74.9 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
99.1 %ⓘ of 4 431 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 94.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
AfD Alternative für Deutschland
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
29 of 4 207 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (substitute), SEDE
Member id
256944
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

74.9 %

4 439 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

ESN median: 91.3 % (−16.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.1 %

4 389 of 4 431 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 94.6 % (+4.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

29 of 4 207 votes where their group had a clear line

21 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

7.9 %

351 of 4 439 votes cast

Participation 74.9 % — ESN median 91.3 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Hans NEUHOFF74.9 %
ESN median91.3 %
Lowest in the group68.6 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members27
With majority line 99.1 % — ESN median 94.6 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Hans NEUHOFF99.1 %
ESN median94.6 %
Lowest in the group70.6 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members27
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13 162 for, 424 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 3 to recital 11 257 for, 292 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8 170 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5 164 for, 425 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 29 to Article 11 353 for, 254 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3 175 for, 399 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j 142 for, 434 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii 110 for, 432 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii 119 for, 436 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d 86 for, 479 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b 154 for, 421 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a 175 for, 408 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1 322 for, 255 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3 362 for, 235 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2 346 for, 254 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a 161 for, 430 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a 160 for, 433 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1 345 for, 237 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a 119 for, 434 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4 158 for, 433 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4 120 for, 433 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4 161 for, 433 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 369 for, 236 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2 114 for, 422 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1 117 for, 422 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text 314 for, 276 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Establishment of the digital euro Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 416 for, 169 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 575 for, 33 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital J 337 for, 273 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 6 to recital J 292 for, 348 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 5, adding text after recital I 274 for, 323 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 4, adding text after recital I 383 for, 239 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 2, adding text after recital C 374 for, 233 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital B 625 for, 7 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22 196 for, 423 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19 358 for, 166 against, 122 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 348 for, 282 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 489 for, 142 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3 488 for, 68 against, 68 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2 484 for, 78 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1 453 for, 141 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 234 for, 367 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on paragraph 5 615 for, 33 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2 243 for, 384 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 2 567 for, 41 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 1 628 for, 18 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 194 for, 445 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 34 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242322
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249292
7 Oct 202420
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202420
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 20241290
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202420
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245756
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254545
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 20253226
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202590
12 Mar 20252280
13 Mar 2025240
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253534
2 Apr 2025251246
3 Apr 20256261
5 May 202550
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220218
8 May 2025103101
21 May 202520
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202520
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258786
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134132
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 2025690
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255554
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186181
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 20252670
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257564
26 Nov 202510096
27 Nov 20251250
15 Dec 202543
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254342
18 Dec 20254240
20 Jan 20266766
21 Jan 2026112109
22 Jan 20265858
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263837
11 Feb 20261312
12 Feb 2026141135
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197185
11 Mar 20266060
12 Mar 20263432
25 Mar 202630
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225218
29 Apr 2026296283
30 Apr 20266866
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269694
21 May 20269897
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 2026400
17 Jun 20261270
18 Jun 2026770
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267270
8 Jul 2026144135
9 Jul 20266765
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 202615597
16 Sept 2026800
17 Sept 202612440

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany99 % of 4 109 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany98 % of 4 205 shared80 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany98 % of 3 853 shared80 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany98 % of 3 918 shared80 %
Alexander SELL ESNGermany98 % of 3 983 shared80 %
Arno BAUSEMER ESNGermany98 % of 3 699 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany98 % of 4 055 shared80 %
Petr BYSTRON ESNGermany97 % of 3 849 shared80 %
Mary KHAN ESNGermany97 % of 4 113 shared80 %
Siegbert Frank DROESE ESNGermany97 % of 4 323 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany96 % of 228 shared49 %
Milan MAZUREK changed group ESNSlovakia81 % of 358 shared49 %
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland78 % of 1 068 shared70 %
Georg MAYER PatriotsAustria77 % of 4 085 shared70 %
Mieke ANDRIESE PatriotsNetherlands77 % of 2 121 shared70 %
Gerald HAUSER PatriotsAustria76 % of 4 312 shared70 %
Petra STEGER PatriotsAustria76 % of 4 357 shared70 %
Roman HAIDER PatriotsAustria76 % of 4 417 shared70 %
Elisabeth DIERINGER PatriotsAustria76 % of 4 398 shared70 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance76 % of 4 098 shared64 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-UA DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working groupMember20 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Feb 2025now
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202428 Jan 2026
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 202414 Jul 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurAFET21 Sept 2026
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurSEDE19 May 2026
2025 Commission report on GeorgiaShadow rapporteurAFET6 Feb 2026
EU strategic defence and security partnershipsShadow rapporteurSEDE4 Sept 2025
Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU‘s need to adapt to be fit for today‘s security challengesShadow rapporteurSEDE4 Sept 2025
Flagship European defence projects of common interestShadow rapporteurSEDE4 Sept 2025
Military mobilityShadow rapporteurSEDE14 May 2025
Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU‘s need to adapt to be fit for today‘s security challengesShadow rapporteurSEDE14 May 2025
Report on 2023-2024 Commission Reports on GeorgiaShadow rapporteurAFET12 Feb 2025
Report on the 2023 - 2024 Commission Reports on SerbiaShadow rapporteurAFET10 Dec 2024

Show all 11 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

46 contributions recorded; 16 on behalf of their group; 72 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
19 May 2026Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 3 minRead
11 Feb 2026Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027 (vote) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 5 minRead
20 Jan 2026CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 Jan 2026Order of business Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 55

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
11 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
11 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on politically motivated banking B-10-2026-0283Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors—
21 May 2026Liabilities of each participating Member State for the EUR 90 billion EU loan package for Ukraine E-10-2026-002108Written questionwith 12 co-authors16 Jul 2026
30 Apr 2026Concerns about the EU’s new age verification app E-10-2026-001771Written questionwith 10 co-authors6 Jul 2026
25 Mar 2026Restoring genuine academic freedom in our universities E-10-2026-001262Written questionwith 27 co-authors22 May 2026
5 Mar 2026Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923Written questionwith 37 co-authors4 May 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026EUR 90 billion EU loan to Ukraine (2026–2027) – budgetary risks, legal basis, and oversight arrangements G-10-2026-001002Major interpellationwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
23 Jan 2026British universities: UAE voices concern, Erasmus+ supports Islamism? E-10-2026-000268Written questionwith 21 co-authors20 Mar 2026

Show all 55 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 18 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Hans NEUHOFF”. Member record. memberId 256944. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256944?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256944. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256944?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256944,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Hans NEUHOFF}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256944?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256944?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256944. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256944. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}