Skip to content

Member

Reinis POZŅAKS

ECR · Latvia

Group
ECR
Country
Latvia
Roll-call participation
97.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
88.2 %ⓘ of 600 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
AS Apvienotais saraksts — Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
30 of 498 votesⓘ
Committees
ENVI (substitute), IMCO, SEDE
Member id
256907
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.4 %

604 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+5.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

88.2 %

529 of 600 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (+0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.0 %

30 of 498 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 11 abstained against the line, 15 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.1 %

67 of 604 votes cast

Participation 97.4 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Reinis POZŅAKS97.4 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 88.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Reinis POZŅAKS88.2 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 209 for, 434 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 421 for, 180 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 13 to recital P 198 for, 444 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 199 for, 438 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 2 174 for, 446 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Recital G — part 2 418 for, 200 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Recital E — part 2 420 for, 224 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 10 to recital E 199 for, 441 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 9, adding text after recital A 150 for, 445 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 38 to paragraph 82 154 for, 450 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Separate vote on paragraph 81 642 for, 6 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 66 173 for, 446 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 36 to paragraph 59 187 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 55 159 for, 438 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Separate vote on paragraph 52 575 for, 9 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 47 152 for, 454 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 45 159 for, 447 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 31 to paragraph 44 152 for, 450 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41 76 for, 488 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 150 for, 452 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 199 for, 446 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 26 to paragraph 34 159 for, 445 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 184 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 22 to paragraph 24 175 for, 433 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 5 to paragraph 21 189 for, 442 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 152 for, 444 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Tie
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 19 206 for, 432 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 19 188 for, 437 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 4 402 for, 238 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 3 404 for, 235 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 2 430 for, 218 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 3 to paragraph 18 145 for, 447 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 188 for, 457 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 7 — part 2 467 for, 126 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 114 for, 458 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 124 for, 452 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2025EU/Euratom Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty: adoption by Euratom Final votePassed 557 for, 47 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Adoption by the Union of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty Final votePassed 554 for, 53 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 386 for, 132 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Final vote — text as a wholeRejected 282 for, 340 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 69 291 for, 356 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 67 — part 2 321 for, 272 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 67 — part 1 585 for, 43 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 66 — part 2 327 for, 250 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 66 — part 1 591 for, 46 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 64 300 for, 339 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 55 289 for, 347 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 53 312 for, 295 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 44 280 for, 322 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 43 361 for, 244 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Rihards KOLS ECRLatvia97 % of 5 279 shared81 %
Roberts ZĪLE ECRLatvia96 % of 4 136 shared81 %
Ivaylo VALCHEV ECRBulgaria90 % of 5 553 shared81 %
Aurelijus VERYGA ECRLithuania87 % of 5 148 shared81 %
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group ECRSpain87 % of 4 871 shared81 %
Diego SOLIER changed group ECRSpain86 % of 5 063 shared81 %
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA ECRCroatia86 % of 4 751 shared81 %
Adrian-George AXINIA ECRRomania86 % of 4 848 shared81 %
Mario MANTOVANI ECRItaly86 % of 4 017 shared81 %
Alessandro CIRIANI ECRItaly86 % of 5 032 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jaroslav KNOT PatriotsCzechia71 % of 2 884 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia71 % of 4 597 shared62 %
Branko GRIMS changed group No groupSlovenia70 % of 5 202 shared50 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal69 % of 5 431 shared68 %
Klara DOSTALOVA PatriotsCzechia69 % of 4 619 shared68 %
Ondřej KNOTEK PatriotsCzechia69 % of 5 184 shared68 %
Tomáš KUBÍN PatriotsCzechia69 % of 5 311 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania69 % of 4 725 shared48 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain69 % of 5 031 shared68 %
Jaroslav BŽOCH PatriotsCzechia69 % of 5 285 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute23 Sept 2026now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-UA DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202422 Sept 2026
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sectionsShadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE1 Sept 2026
From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale upShadow rapporteurSEDE8 Jun 2026
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionIMCO11 May 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE17 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activitiesShadow rapporteur for an opinionIMCO10 Mar 2026
Amending Directives 2009/43/EC and 2009/81/EC, as regards the simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and the simplification of security and defence procurementShadow rapporteurSEDE3 Feb 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE2 Feb 2026
Union Civil Protection Mechanism and Union support for health emergency preparedness and response, and repealing Decision No 1313/2013/EU (Union Civil Protection Mechanism)Opinion rapporteurSEDE2 Feb 2026
Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceShadow rapporteur for an opinionIMCO5 Nov 2025
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereigntyShadow rapporteurAFET30 Oct 2025

Show all 22 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 29 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) on behalf of ECRSpeech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) on behalf of ECRSpeech · 1 minRead
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) on behalf of ECRSpeech · 2 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 4 minRead
26 Nov 2025EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Stepping up funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence: the use of Russian frozen assets (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 40

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0329Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0327Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0308Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua - the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0317Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0322Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors—
8 Jun 2026Health-sector preparedness as a component of EU security and defence E-10-2026-002342Written questionwith 4 co-authors31 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0227Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION New Chinese law on “ethnic unity and progress” and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities B-10-2026-0234Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors—
10 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0145Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran B-10-2026-0133Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—

Show all 40 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
2 Jul 2026From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up SEDE-AM-789957 SEDE70
1 Jul 2026European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2) IMCO-AM-790776 IMCO4
1 Jul 2026European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European cybersecurity certification framework, and ICT supply chain security and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/881 (The Cybersecurity Act 2) IMCO-AM-790134 IMCO16
11 Jun 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure SEDE-AM-789927 SEDE48
13 May 2026Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE) CJ55-AM-788873 CJ5511
11 May 2026Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 SEDE-AM-788792 SEDE10
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786976 CJ5755
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786977 CJ577
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975 CJ5729
24 Mar 2026Union Civil Protection Mechanism and Union support for health emergency preparedness and response, and repealing Decision No 1313/2013/EU (Union Civil Protection Mechanism) SEDE-AM-786716 SEDE12

Show all 44 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Reinis POZŅAKS”. Member record. memberId 256907. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256907?page=85&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256907. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256907?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256907,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Reinis POZŅAKS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256907?page=85&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256907?page=85&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256907. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256907. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}