Skip to content

Member

Emma RAFOWICZ

S&D · France

Group
S&D
Country
France
Roll-call participation
68.7 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line
89.8 %ⓘ of 1 732 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 95.8 %
More facts (5)
National party
PS Parti socialiste
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
155 of 1 692 votesⓘ
Committees
CULT (vice-chair), FEMM, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
256902
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

68.7 %

1 732 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.1 % (−21.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

89.8 %

1 555 of 1 732 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 95.8 % (−6.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.2 %

155 of 1 692 votes where their group had a clear line

137 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.7 %

30 of 1 732 votes cast

Participation 68.7 % — S&D median 90.1 %, 135 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Emma RAFOWICZ68.7 %
S&D median90.1 %
Lowest in the group35.1 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members135
With majority line 89.8 % — S&D median 95.8 %, 135 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Emma RAFOWICZ89.8 %
S&D median95.8 %
Lowest in the group83.7 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members135
  • 2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 8 to recital AJ 221 for, 426 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI 218 for, 419 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital AC — part 2 442 for, 178 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Separate vote on recital U 419 for, 226 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 6 to recital Q 236 for, 425 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital G — part 2 438 for, 182 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 244 for, 410 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 222 for, 429 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 431 for, 223 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 15 — part 2 253 for, 165 against, 214 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 234 for, 423 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 11 — part 2 455 for, 211 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 224 for, 404 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 1 150 for, 474 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 415 for, 105 against, 142 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 128 against, 104 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Separate vote on paragraph 41 336 for, 288 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 201 for, 462 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 426 for, 140 against, 107 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 202 for, 461 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 2 to recital A 191 for, 467 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 22 462 for, 128 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 160 for, 464 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 21 510 for, 148 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 463 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 465 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 20 480 for, 152 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 145 for, 519 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 79 for, 557 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 453 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 440 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver Final vote — text as a wholePassed 602 for, 47 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 563 for, 44 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 560 for, 75 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 423 for, 57 against, 174 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Proposal to vote on amendments 135 for, 468 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 151 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to vote on amendments 120 for, 509 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East 336 for, 86 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI 244 for, 179 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 12 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) to recital F 243 for, 211 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 10, adding text after recital E 87 for, 353 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 164 for, 288 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 300 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 167 for, 294 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 3 313 for, 94 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 2 303 for, 165 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 1 323 for, 97 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 11 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance99 % of 3 881 shared93 %
Christophe CLERGEAU S&DFrance99 % of 3 523 shared93 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance99 % of 3 923 shared93 %
Eric SARGIACOMO S&DFrance99 % of 3 993 shared93 %
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance99 % of 3 457 shared93 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance99 % of 4 113 shared93 %
Pierre JOUVET S&DFrance99 % of 3 790 shared93 %
Nora MEBAREK S&DFrance98 % of 3 843 shared93 %
Claire FITA S&DFrance98 % of 3 368 shared93 %
Chloé RIDEL S&DFrance98 % of 2 866 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia88 % of 3 541 shared86 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands88 % of 4 073 shared83 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands88 % of 3 797 shared83 %
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ GreensRomania87 % of 2 622 shared83 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland87 % of 3 582 shared83 %
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia87 % of 3 682 shared83 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany87 % of 4 042 shared83 %
Tineke STRIK GreensNetherlands87 % of 3 976 shared83 %
Kai TEGETHOFF GreensGermany87 % of 3 626 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember22 Sept 2025now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Feb 2025now

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Chemical submission: addressing its consequences on women's rights and safety in the EURapporteurFEMM16 Sept 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Opinion rapporteurCULT3 Mar 2026
Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818RapporteurCULT27 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE24 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationFEMM2 Sept 2025
Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapShadow rapporteurFEMM24 Feb 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionFEMM24 Feb 2025
Standing Rapporteur for Creative Europe programme (MFF 2028–2034)RapporteurCULT5 Feb 2025
Mission culturelle à Badischl en Autriche de la commission CULT. Date du 28 au 30 octobre 2024Official delegation25 Oct 2024
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairCULT22 Jul 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

16 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 23 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 May 2026Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 2 minRead
27 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Presentation of the Digital Networks Act (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Tackling AI deepfakes and sexual exploitation on social media by making full use of the EU’s digital rules (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Dec 2025European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Show all 16 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 46

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
13 Sept 2026Repeated ban on Oradea Pride and compliance with fundamental rights in the use of EU funds E-10-2026-003648Written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Protecting workers from extreme heatwaves E-10-2026-003456Written questionwith 8 co-authorsNot yet answered
20 Jul 2026EU-funded Latvian sexuality-education project – non-discrimination compliance and risk of further replication E-10-2026-003056Written questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950Written questionwith 31 co-authors11 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026Preserving EU capacities to produce paper pulp and cellulose fibres – state of affairs at Fibre Excellence P-10-2026-002901Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors12 Aug 2026
8 Jul 2026European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822Written questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
30 Jun 2026Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698Written questionwith 43 co-authors18 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518Written questionwith 35 co-authors15 Sept 2026

Show all 46 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 67

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791044 IMCO1
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791043 IMCO2
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791040 IMCO2
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791041 IMCO3
1 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) LIBE-AM-790741 LIBE26
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057 CJ657
19 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘AgoraEU’ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790063 CJ653
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062 CJ659
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058 CJ657
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059 CJ658

Show all 67 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Emma RAFOWICZ”. Member record. memberId 256902. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256902?page=18&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256902. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256902?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256902,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Emma RAFOWICZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256902?page=18&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256902?page=18&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256902. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256902. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}